JUDAISM AND THE VATICAN - LEON DE PONCINS
click on picture for book
Vatican (10)
What was Egypt’s peace proposal in 1971-1973?
After the War of Attrition was ended by a US-brokered cease-fire agreement, Egypt expressed its willingness “to enter into a peace agreement with Israel” in a February 20, 1971 letter to the UN Jarring Mission, by then almost moribund. But this seeming moderation masked an unchanging Egyptian irredentism and unwillingness to accept a real peace, as shown by the letter’s sweeping reservations and preconditions. In fact, Sadat, very new as Egypt’s leader, was primarily motivated by a need to placate Egyptian opinion. He later recalled:
- I believed that as military action was ruled out at the time, a diplomatic offensive had to be launched: the broad masses wanted to see action being taken at the time.
The crucial sentences about a “peace agreement with Israel” were neither published nor broadcast in Egypt. Moreover, Egypt refused to enter direct talks with the Jewish State. Israel attempted to at least transform the struggling Jarring mission into indirect talks by addressing all letters not to Jarring, but to the Egyptian government. Egypt refused to accept them.
Just after the letter to Jarring, Anwar Sadat, Egypt’s new president, addressed the Palestine National Council (PNC) meeting in Cairo. He promised support to the PLO “until victory” and declared that Egypt would not accept Resolution 242.
Five days after Sadat suggested he was ready to make peace with Israel, Mohammed Heikal, a Sadat confidant and editor of the semi-official Al-Ahram, wrote:
- Arab policy at this stage has but two objectives. The first, the elimination of the traces of the 1967 aggression through an Israeli withdrawal from all the territories it occupied that year. The second objective is the elimination of the traces of the 1948 aggression, by the means of the elimination of the State of Israel itself. This is, however, as yet an abstract, undefined objective, and some of us have erred in commencing the latter step before the former.
Sadat branded 1971 “the year of decision” (peace or war) for Israel, yet no war developed when Israel failed to sign a peace treaty. In 1972 and 1973, Sadat expanded his efforts by trying to involve the United States, threatening war unless the US made Israel sign a agreement that included full withdrawal. The threats were discounted until the Yom Kippur War in October 1973.
Egyptian President Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin shared the 1978 Nobel Peace Prize for bringing their countires into those historic agreements. However, the initiative was far from universally popular in Egypt and the Arab world in general, particularly among Muslim fundamentalists. The Arabs believed that only a unified Arab stance and the threat of force would persuade Israel to negotiate a settlement of the Palestinian issue that would satisfy Palestinian demands for a homeland. Without Egypt’s military power, the threat of force evaporated because no single Arab state was strong enough militarily to confront Israel alone. Thus, the Arabs felt betrayed and dismayed that the Palestinian issue, the core of the Arab-Israeli conflict, would remain an unresolved, destabilizing force in the region.
The agreement with Israel brought peace to Egypt but not prosperity. With no real improvement in the economy, Sadat became increasingly unpopular. His isolation in the Arab world was matched by his increasing remoteness from the mass of Egyptians. While Sadat’s critics in the Arab world remained beyond his reach, increasingly he reacted to criticism at home by expanding censorship and jailing his opponents. Sadat subjected the Egyptians to a series of referenda on his actions and proposals that he invariably won by more than 99 percent of the vote. In May 1980, an impressive, nonpartisan body of citizens charged Sadat with superseding his own constitution.
In the months leading up to the assassination Sadat had lost much of his support at home and in the West due to a brutal crackdown on fundamentalists. In June 1981 tensions between Muslims and Copts in Egypt exploded into a gruesome round of violence in the overcrowded Cairo slum of al-Zawiyya al-Hamra, precipitated by intense summer heat coupled with frequent cutoffs in the water supply. Men, women, and children were slaughtered."
1978 Camp David Peace Accords | Palestine FactsWhat were the 1978 Camp David peace accords?
Egypt and Israel developed a state of war since the founding of Israel in 1948. A six-day war in 1967 saw Israel taking over Egypt’s Sinai area. After the consequences of the 1973 Yom Kippur War, Egypt realized that their issues cannot be resolved with mere fighting and a diplomatic strategy should be adopted. And so, it was Egypt’s President Anwar Sadat who turned to diplomacy as his ultimate weapon, a move which was never taken up by any Arab state previously.
Camp David Accords have their roots in Sadat’s anomalous visit to Jerusalem which lasted from November 19-21, 1977. Sadat visited Jerusalem to address Israeli Knesset, marking it the first ever visit to Israel by any Arab head of the state. For this act, Sadat’s name was included in Times Magazine as the “Man of the Year for 1977.”
The consequence of Sadat’s visit led to the targeted peace negotiations between Israel and Egypt that went on intermittently for one year. Then came a deadlock in negotiations and to break it and move forward, President Carter invited Anwar Sadat and Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin to Camp David (Maryland) on September 5, 1978 for a summit meeting between the US, Egypt and Israel.
There were twelve days of covert meetings and negotiations at the Presidential retreat between the two representatives from Egypt and Israel, arbitrated by President Carter. The Egyptian-Israeli meeting which lasted from September 5 to September 17, 1978 came to a conclusion with both parties signing an agreement in the White House. The agreements had its base in the UN Resolutions 242 and 338, with the purpose of bringing peaceful solutions to the issues between Egypt and Israel, in addition to providing “a just, comprehensive, and durable settlement of the Middle East conflict” for any other neighboring Arab state seeking to come to terms with Israel.
The first deal in the agreements was for Israel to give over the control of Sinai to Egypt within three months. Following this, Israel agreed to vacate Sinai and dismantle its air bases in a period of three years. In return, Egypt agreed to maintain complete diplomatic terms with Israel and to allow Israel safe passage through the Gulf of Aqaba, the Strait of Tiran and the Suez Canal.
Second agreement in the Camp David Accords was regarding the question of Palestine, which included a framework laying down the method of negotiations involving the settlement of West Bank and Gaza as Palestinian territories.
The agreement between Egypt and Israel clearly established the relations that the two countries will share in future; withdrawal of forces from the Sinai, demilitarization in the peninsula and the framework of supervision as well. Matters regarding the future of Gaza, Judea and Samaria were however less clear in the agreement and later took the form of different interpretations for the US, Israel and Egypt.
President Carter became the witness of the Accords signed between Israel and Egypt. The peace negotiations between the two nations became the first of its kind between Israel and any Arab State and the representatives of the two nations, Sadat and Begin were awarded with a Nobel Peace Prize in 1978 for taking this initiative.
MORE REAL HISTORY REVEALED: WHAT REALLY HAPPENED IN THE "YOM KIPPUR" WAR
Again, readers, it does appear that our so called "history" may not appear as it seems. I want to present the following very startling report from Israel Shamir, through the website: My Catbird Seat, at www.mycatbirdseat.com, entitled: "What Really Happened In The "Yom Kippur" War" for everyone to read for themselves. It brings some very shocking revelations that many may find quite disturbing... But as I have always said, what passes as history usually is not as it seems! I do have some further comments to follow:
For an American it is likely to come as a shock. According to the Vinogradov memo (to be published by us in full in the Russian weekly Expert next Monday), Anwar al-Sadat, holder of the titles of President, Prime Minister, ASU Chairman, Chief Commander, Supreme Military Ruler, entered into conspiracy with the Israelis, betrayed his ally Syria, condemned the Syrian army to destruction and Damascus to bombardment, allowed General Sharon’s tanks to cross without hindrance to the western bank of the Suez Canal, and actually planned a defeat of the Egyptian troops in the October War.
Vinogradov dispels the idea of surprise: in his view, both the canal crossing by the Egyptians and the inroads by Sharon were planned and agreed upon in advance by Kissinger, Sadat and Meir.
The concentration of the forces was observable and could not escape Israeli attention. Why did the Egyptian forces not proceed after the crossing but stood still?Why did they have no plans for advancing?Why there was a forty km-wide unguarded gap between the 2d and the 3d armies, the gap that invited Sharon’s raid?How could Israeli tanks sneak to the western bank of the Canal?Why did Sadat refuse to stop them?Why were there no reserve forces on the western bank of the Canal?
These questions can’t be answered if Sadat is to be considered a true patriot of Egypt. But they can be answered in full, if we consider a possibility of collusion between Sadat, the US and Israeli leadership ~ a conspiracy in which each participant pursued his own goals.A conspiracy in which each participant did not know the full details of other participants’ game.A conspiracy in which each participant tried to gain more ground despite the overall agreement between them.
Before the war Sadat was at the nadir of his power: in Egypt and abroad he had lost prestige. The least educated and least charismatic of Nasser’s followers, Sadat was isolated. 
I could see that the Israeli stubborn defense on the Golan Heights could have thwarted the Syrian advance, but the Egyptian lack of initiative after their initial successes puzzled me immensely. They were in the clear, basically, with nothing to stop them from advancing deep into Sinai. Instead they just halted and allowed a massive hole between their two armies in the Sinai to blatantly stay open to allow for the "Sharon Raid" to take place. For such a poor tactic to take place on the part of the Egyptians was either sheer stupidity, or there was something else afoot.
I do not doubt it for a second that what has been passed as "history" about this war is an absolute falsehood. And it would not surprise me one bit that the ultra-zionist Jewish criminal Henry Kissinger was behind the entire orchestration of this war one bit. What is sad is that thousands of troops on both sides of that conflict died for their twisted leadership's political gains, to end the Soviet influence in the Middle East, and to allow the United States to come in to both "save" Israel, and be the great political peace broker.....
I have always said that what we have as our so called "Official History" is nothing but pure lies... I have made it my duty to get some real history out for everyone to see and judge for themselves. For if we have not learned from history, then we are surely doomed to repeat it.
More to come
NTS
What agreements were negotiated to end the Yom Kippur War?
The Yom Kippur War, also known as the 1973 Arab-Israeli War, was a war between Israel and an alliance of two Arab states, Syria and Egypt. The war which started on October 6, ended on October 25, 1973 by the intercession of Soviet Union and the US who provoked the UN Security Council resolutions of the series 338-340.
A cease-fire agreement between Egypt and Israel was signed formally on November 11, 1973 in a tent which was erected at the “Kilometer 101” checkpoint located on the Cairo-Suez road. Since the signing of the 1949 armistice agreements, this marked the first agreements between Israel and any Arab country.
In December 1973, a Peace Conference was held in Geneva where the invitees were Israel, Syria, Jordan and Egypt and was a joint effort by the Soviet Union and the United States to effectuate any concrete Arab-Israeli peace negotiations. This conference was recognized by UN Security Council Resolution 344 and was based on the Resolution 338, calling for a “just and durable peace”. However, the conference was adjourned on January 9, 1974 as Syria refused attendance and also because PLO was not invited.
Kissinger, US Secretary of State took up the use of direct diplomacy with Israel and the Arab states involved in the opposition. The first fruitful result was an initial military disengagement agreement, which was signed by Israel and Egypt on January 18, 1974. This agreement, which later came to be known as Sinai I, was given the name of ‘Sinai Separation of Forces Agreement’. Under the terms of the agreement, Israel agreed to pull back its forces from the areas West of Suez Canal which it had occupied since the cease-fire in October 1973. Moreover, the Israeli forces were also pulled back from an area of several miles, an area where the security zones for Egypt, UN and Israel were created, each roughly six miles wide.
This agreement proved beneficial for Egypt as it regained its control over the western and eastern banks of the canal which all fell under the Egyptian territory. Although Israel gave over 12-13 miles of the eastern bank of the canal, it still occupied the rest of Sinai.
An end to eighty one days of artillery battle over Golan front was put with another diplomatic strike by Kissinger who brought Israel and Syria to sign the Agreement on Disengagement on May 31, 1974. The agreement resulted in Syria gaining back the control over areas which were occupied by Israel in October 1973 war and also from the war in 1967. A further agreement came in the form of UN Security Council Resolution 350, signed on May 31, 1974. According to the agreement, Syrian civilians would be allowed to return to their respective restored areas from where they fled during the hostilities.
For the issue of Sinai front which was still unresolved, another Egyptian-Israeli disengagement agreement was signed in Geneva on September 4, 1975 which was given the name of the ‘Sinai Interim Agreement’, later changed to Sinai II. This agreement led Israel to withdraw from another 12-26 miles and a new buffer zone for UN was created at the vacated area. The Israeli Prime Minister, Rabin agreed to sign the agreement mainly to please the US, to put a wedge between the alliance of Egypt and Syria, and not with much intention of reconciliation.
There were some other features of the Egyptian-Israeli agreement as well in which both parties agreed to not use or threaten to use forces or military blockades; follow ceasefire justly; make arrangements for the annual renewal of UNEF mandate; permission from Egypt to let the non-military cargoes transporting between the two places pass through the Suez Canal; and, an agreement that the US will provide around 200 men to work as civil technicians at the early-warning stations for the areas of Mitla and Giddi passes.
What Israel (Tyrannically Occupied Palestine) is really up to with their Bolshevik (Yes they still are that.) Russian Jews' Kahal co-conspirators.
The Justice of God: "I Have The Power" is the outward appurtenance of the MKULTRA type mind control and propaganda control based in ancient pagan Twilight Language shown herePalestine Cry: Lord have mercy on Your suffering ones
The Evil of Twilight Language. Twilight language is sorcery and demonic obsession. It has ancient engraved-sculptured artifacts associated with it. Their purpose is to be the idol by which demonic spirits are conjured to possess the unsuspecting initiate-victim.
Honest Reporting about the Holy Land - Ikret
http://www.jerusalemites.org/crimes/crimes_against_christianity/7.htm
Confusion
Remember Rod Serling {Rodman Edward "Rod" Serling (December 25, 1924 – June 28, 1975)}, the Jewish Writer who hosted a TV show, way back in the black and white days of Television which he wrote, called the Twilight Zone? It was obsessive about two things, twilight language/obsession and the "holocaust." Both are propagandistic in the hands of those who push them into the consciousness of the unsuspecting.
This link below shows the utterly occult infiltration via Jewish Apostasy: Lurianic Kabalistic Talmudic Mishnah, Gemara, sorcery - Zohar and every form of pagan infidel magic and mix of "conspiracy theory" into the consciousness of people by Fortean and pre-Fortean ancient pagan (Assyro-Babylonian-Persian-Indian Sanskrit/pre-Sanskrit) Obsessive-Compulsive Twilight Language to confuse and obviate and obscure in every way possible, especially by telling half truths, so that the real issues of true faith in God and the persecution of Christians in the Holy Land and throughout the earth and the murder of babies by abortion and the persecution of the Palestinians in their own land by interlopers is utterly pushed aside and ignored with the objective that vast parts of the so called "mainstream" will sit idly by while consenting to what they watch, knowing full well that it is evil, and not lift a finger to stop it. This is REAL "chutzpah."
See this:
Welcome to the 3rd Dimension.....
http://3rddimension.online.fr/
This is the Kabalistic View of the Naqba
Zionism 101 and the Palestine Conflict
http://3rddimension.online.fr/zionpal.htm
This is a truth teller.
The Life of an American Jew
in Racist Marxist Israel
Written in 1985 by Jack Bernstein
This is where it is leading the world to:
The Mark, the Name, the Number of the beast and the Tower of Babel = Ecumenism
The Mark of the beast
"16. The followers of Antichrist will be marked with a character in imitation of the sign that St. John saw upon the foreheads of the servants of God. This indicates that Antichrist and his prophet will introduce ceremonies to imitate the Sacraments of the Church. In fact there will be a complete organization ―― a church of Satan set up in opposition to the Church of Christ. Satan will assume the part of God the Father; Antichrist will be honored as Saviour, and his prophet will usurp the role of Pope. Their ceremonies will counterfeit the Sacraments and their works of magic be heralded as miracles. A similar project was attempted in the fourth century when Julian the Apostate counterfeited Catholic worship with pagan ceremonies in honor of Mithras and Cybele. He established a priesthood and instituted ceremonies in imitation of Baptism and Confirmation."Rev. E. Sylvester Berry, D.D.
The Apocalypse of St. John
Discussion on Apoc: xiii, 16.
John W. Winterich, Columbus, Ohio, 1921
Originally there were in ancient religion four elements (fire spirit water earth) with spirit deleted by the pagans and air and then also and/or aether inserted. These were variously identified with the visible planets and gods/goddesses of the pagans. The order was also rearranged variously and finally a sixth element was added: universal mind (just as the heretical interpretation of Jesus Christ as the impersonal word of God, instead of enhypostasia which is correct that Jesus Christ is the Person-al Son and Word of God incarnate). Finally language was seen as the mystical means of connecting with the powers of the gods/goddesses (actually Satan and the other fallen angels and the demons [demons are, according to the Church Fathers, the non-human souls of the pre-flood nephilim]), and with that alpha-numeric theosophies, namely Hebrew Gematria (Greek and Roman variations are Isopsephia) were especially used. These connections were for the sorcery/magic astrological control over the elements (Greek – stoichea)and even other men. Trigrams, pentagrams, hexagramset al were symbols used in conjunction with this. The final Mark of the Beast will not be accidental or co-incidental. The final mark of the Antichrist (the Beast) will be willful knowingly on purpose representation of the damned individual’s name by gematria/isopsephia spelling of his name to equal 666. He will seek to impress this knowingly on all men. All who knowingly take it will be irrevocably damned. The Mark of the beast, now and then is also the so called ‘Magen Star of David’ which is actually the star of Rempham (Satan) that St. Stephen condemned in the book of the Acts (see below).
If one studies freemasonry one finds that it is the worst kept secret there is, on purpose. They intend to be more and more open about their aims until people openly join in their rebellion against God for that very reason. It is true that there are roots of Byzantine-Venetian banking -- Phnariot, Darius Socinus etc., and there is a stabilization of the power that was concentrated therein and in connection with Switzerland (including the powerful Warburgs and Rothschilds). It is also true that without the connivings of Cardinal Richelieu it would have been stopped a long time ago. It is also true that unscrupulous Jews were involved every step of the way as Bernard Lazare, himself a Jew tells us. There were Jews round Adam Weishaupt in the late 1700’s when Weishaupt added the very Lurianic Illuminism, overt Satanism, the final formulation in which (Weishaupt’s formula) “it will advance until its final conflict with Christianity must determine whether Christ or Satan shall reign on this earth to the end.” Weishaupt’s way is the way of the Masonic lodges today, to first seduce men into his organization through its lower degrees. To quote Monsignor Dillon from his Edinburgh lectures:
"A man, though in Masonry, may not be willing to become an atheist or a Socialist, for some time at least. He may have in his heart a profound conviction that God exists, and some hope left ofreturning to that God at or before his death. He may have entered Masonry for purposes of ambition, for motives of vanity, from mere lightness of character. He may continue hisprayers and refuse, if a Catholic, to give up theMother of God and some practice of piety loved by him from his youth. But Masonry is a capital system to wean a man gradually away from all these things. It does not at once deny the existence of God, nor at once attack the Christian dispensation. It commences by giving the Christian idea of God an easy and, under semblance of respect, an almost imperceptible shake. It swears by the name of God in all its oaths. It calls Him, however, not a Creator, only an architect — the great Architect of the universe. It carefully avoids all mention of Christ, of the Adorable Trinity, of the unity of Faith, or of any faith. It protests a respect for the convictions of every man, for the idolatrous Parsee, for the Mohammedan (which Dillon should refer to as Muslim), the heretic, the Jew, the schismatic, the Catholic. By and by, in higher degrees, it gives a ruder shock to the belief in the Deity, and a gradual inducement to favor Naturalism." In the above quote both the Mohammedan (which Dillon should refer to as Muslim) and the Catholic are not condemned since both worship the true God. What is condemned is the mixing of that with the idolaters.
It is Masonry that we find at the core of the Vatican II apostasy. The smoke of Satan is the Satanic black mass, as mentioned by Malachi Martin in his writings. Although the Antipope Paul VI mentioned the smoke of Satan, he was part and parcel of it. It is especially the black mass child sacrifice by murdering and offering this murdered child to Satan, it is that form, that is the core of the Novus Ordo and Vatican II and everyone that is connected with it and has lead and will lead to nothing but apostasy and that black mass that continues to this day; this Masonry with the Judeo-Freemason Cardinals of the Vatican who were and are the willing servants of Satan and the Antipopes who are the willing pawns of Satan. Those Antipopes are: John XXIII, Paul VI, John Paul I, John Paul II and Benedict XVI.
This prefigures the final abomination of desolation in the rebuilt temple in Jerusalem.
St. Stephen speaking:
Acts:7:
42 ¶ And God turned and gave them up to serve the host of heaven, as it is written in the books of the prophets: Did you offer victims and sacrifices to me for forty years, in the desert, O house of Israel?
43 And you took unto you the tabernacle of Moloch and the star of your god Rempham, figures which you made to adore them. And I will carry you away beyond Babylon. (DRV)
The same apostasy exists today in Jerusalem:
"It is a known fact in Kabbala (Cabbalah or Cabala from Qabbala) that impurity and evil are inherently attracted to sanctity,' said a director of one of the most respected Kabbala yeshivot in Jerusalem...."
See below for the basic principle of Satanism governing Talmudic Kabbalistic Judaism. It is not about the holiness they pretend it to be. It is about willful apostasy to the Devil.
From:
http://www.theosociety.org/pasadena/etgloss/daa-der.htm
“Daemon Est Deus Inversus" (Latin) Daemon is divinity inverted; more commonly, the Devil is God inverted. An ancient Hermetic, and later Qabbalistic, aphorism referring to that polar power which is required by the equilibrium and harmony in nature. The One, when manifested, becomes Two, and from the Two are unfolded or evolved all the sequence of manifest existence. Spirit and matter, good and evil, as distinct conceptions exist only by their mutual contrast. There is no evil per se, but the human notion of essential evil arises from our inability to take in the whole at a single glance.
Daemon is applicable in general to all formative power, from the highest to the lowest; in this aphorism it denotes the formative rays in their manifestation in and on the lower planes of prakriti, called by contrast the nether pole. Western monotheism, having anthropomorphized the higher creative powers into a personal God, personified the lower powers into a Devil and demons. But Satan or the Adversary is only God's messenger, because what is below reflects what is above. This aphorism, then, states that all the manifested universe is the representation or material inversion or reflection of the divine essence and its emanations which in their aggregate compose the spiritual background and causal forces of the universe. Furthermore, a reflected image reverses.
Finally, the aphorism denotes the astral light, represented by a black triangle inverted on a white (SD 1:424).”
***
This is the “Star of David” which is really the Star of the Solomonic temple and the Star of Rephaim which St. Stephen in the Acts condemned the Pharisees and their predecessor apostates in the time of Moses for, and has nothing to do with David. It is also the sign of Freemasonry and in the interpretation of those who embrace the Zohar and Lurianic Cabala is (though they don’t admit it to Christians who would be horrified by this) their symbol of service to Satan and not God.
"The HEXAGRAM [Lurianic Cabalistic Magen David 6-pointed star] was adopted by the Zionist Organization at the First Zionist Congress in 1897." (Cavendish, p. 1300)
Daemon Est Deus Inversus is pure Satanism and will be punished in hell by God for eternity. It is the absolute founding principle of Lurianic Cabbalism embodied in the Zohar as well, which is the essence of Talmudism and what is the belief of Talmudic Judaism. Therefore it is totally Antichrist and all people who have any part of it will go to hell for eternity.
No comments:
Post a Comment