Libya was just castrated and made into a carcass for World Zionism and the New World Order.
Next is the Western Sahara and the Sahel. That is: Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco and Western Sahara. Below (south of) those are the buffer states (Mauritania, Mali, Niger, Chad, Sudan and Eritrea) between traditional long time Arab cultured, Islamic civilization and traditional Bantu speaker culture African nations. These buffer nations will be targeted along with the rest of Africa and the NWO plan is to sweep all of Africa and its people into complete slavery. Especially watch the southern Sahel. The Pan-African movement had always looked to Gaddafi as a potential leader of all of Africa, in the role of spokesman. That of course has been destroyed. Gaddafi's mistakes included trusting the word of Washington and trusting Rome, Italy.
A note on Kardinal Schoenborn. He is Tubingen agente 'Benediktos' Ratzinger's prime shadow in covering over all of the Vatican's misdeeds. Schoenborn plays the good guy, but he is totally in Benediktos' pocket. They will be of no real help to anyone.
The Bavarian Guelph (and their central banks) have totally taken over the Vatican. They are core to the New World Order - the NWO is the Nazis and the Zionists and their puppet masters the Bavarian Guelph Illuminati. They hate all of Arab culture and Islam as standing in their way of the NWO ruling the world.
Instead of helping, the Illuminati Social Political Engineers exacerbate all the suffering in Africa and around the world while dictating imperiously through the Anglo-American Foreign Policy Association, every whim to further destroy all African independence. The truth of the matter is they never liked loosing their slave colonies and want that abomination put back in place. Throughout it all the Illuminati's propagandists always try to present themselves as reasonable and fair. That simply is a lie.
For a number of years, Nairobi (Kenya) has been the de facto capital of Somalia after the State has disintegrated into anarchy. It has been where Somalis sought refuge, re-started their lives, and networked with the rest of the world. By the same token, it has been where almost all of the eighteen or so failed “reconciliation” conferences were concocted, and Somalis found the funding and the nourishment for the indigenous political demons that kept them divided and at war with one another for over two decades.
Yet, to this day—at least from the international community’s point of view—all initiatives related to peace, security, humanitarian, and development must be conceived, crafted, and executed via Nairobi; Through a network of international institutions and organizations with sullied reputation of money squandering, laundering, and rewarding corruption with more contracts. And so long as this continues, so too would the status quo.
Like Vienna (Austria) during the Cold War, Nairobi became a magnet that attracts both the positive and the negative. It is a place where a few good apples are found- those Somali patriots who are committed to work to bring an end to the misery of their people. It is also a place where many rotten ones are found- those who callously sellout everything about their country and people. Nairobi is where the buyers meet the sellers. Moreover, the city is one of the major hubs for security experts, “dealmakers” and deal breakers. It is also the center where around a $1 billion that is donated annually on behalf of Somalia is managed and mismanaged. It is where corrupted technocrats and other colorful characters compete for geopolitical strategic advantages or for crude economic exploitation. The city is also the center for a new breed of diplomats known as “gorilla diplomats”.
In dealing with countries such as Somalia, these types of diplomats are granted the flexibility and authority to make decisions without any direct involvement of their Foreign Ministries. This, needless to say, has its positives and negatives. One of the positives might be their less bureaucratic decision-making capacity. One of the negatives might be the inadvertent creation of diplomatic despots who haphazardly assert authorities far exceeding their professional titles. Against this backdrop, the Special Representative of the Secretary General for Somalia, and the head of the United Nations Political Office for Somalia, Dr. Augustine Mahiga, had the liberty to nose dive into the intra-Somali politics of contention in his recent interview by Somalia Report.
As someone who occasionally freewheels beyond his diplomatic boundaries and subjectively tips the scale in favor of one convenient group to another, Dr. Mahiga pushed the limits with that interview. Without offering any substantiation to his claims, Dr. Mahiga offered this assertion when asked about the Somali politicians:
“There is a palace coup that has taken place in Villa Somalia. The Ala-Sheikh group is back in power, which should not be downplayed. The Ala-Sheikh group by definition never wanted any power sharing, they are against the Roadmap because of its inclusiveness to bring in the regions, to bring in Ahlu Sunnah, to bring in civil society.”
Why this crude accusation, especially when there is only 5 months left from the end of the transitional period?
Considering the timing of the message and the clout of the messenger, this was nothing but a desperate act to give traction to a baseless narrative that was being cooked since the Djibouti Agreement…that there is a clandestine Islamist cabal with sinister motives who are bent on high-jacking the political power. Consumed by that paranoia-based narrative and other erroneous assumptions that all organized Islamist groups, including those who are non-violent who are willing to legally partake in the political process, should not be trusted, Dr. Mahiga unleashes the following rant:
“They (Ala-Sheikh) are not very different than the Shabaab, except that they don’t take up arms. But for them, the fundamentals are the ideological purity, and they’ve reached a point where they have successfully staged a comeback, and they have just created a forum, which they have formed under Farmajo (former Prime Minister): an Islamic organization which they are going to transform into a political party”.
The boogieman, or the Al-Sheikh group that he referenced, are some of the students of the late Islamic scholar, Sheikh Mohamed Moallim during the 70s, 80s, and early 90s.
Contrary to the urban legend surrounding his influence, the Sheikh was in fact a progressive religious scholar who was ahead of his time. He graduated from Al-Azhar University, and his teachings were focused on bringing social and religious reform through non-violent means. He taught that the individual is part of the whole and that his/her actions either contribute positively or negatively to that whole- the society. And that the individual should never resort to bloodshed, or wreak havoc, or cause chaos even when living under an authoritarian government that publicly executed ten Islamic scholars and imprisoned a few others—including the Sheikh—for disagreeing with it. As an active agent of positive change, the individual must rely on educating one self (religious and secular) and on educating others, but to never impose his/her views on others.
A few individuals from that school of thought (and other Islamic thoughts) have joined the post Djibouti Agreement Transitional Federal Government. And though they were systematically cleansed out of the political structure through one “re-shuffle” or “accord”, their contribution and legacy stand out.
So, what threat does Dr. Mahiga fear? And even if it were true that that group and their allies in the Daljir Forum (a coalition of several political parties with diverse interests) have “successfully staged a comeback”, what is wrong with that? And more importantly, are we to deduce from Dr. Mahiga’s statements that there is a gatekeeper outside the will of the Somali people who should keep this wrongly implicated group in the periphery?
Considering the broad-based negative reaction his statements have generated and official grievances filed through the UN Secretary General’s office, Dr. Mahiga’s statements are not considered the result of judgment deficit. Rather, they are considered as statements that were deliberately crafted to sow the seeds of suspicion and conflict between certain political parties and groups. And since the groups under this attack were the very same groups that openly advocated for the transfer of all international community offices that deal with the Somalia issue to either Mogadishu or other parts of Somalia, this raises yet another question: Was this a payback for pressuring the UN and other international organization to leave their cozy environment in Nairobi and transfer their operations to Mogadishu- something that Dr. Mahiga had to do a few months earlier?
Be that as it may, the process of “de-Nairobification” must continue. In addition to bringing an end to the costly routine of multiple outsourcing of all projects and services to Somalia, such decision will bring an end to a detrimental sub-culture that developed since the break up of the State. A sub-culture that lures governmental officials and members of the Parliament to accept invitations and attend private meetings with various colorful foreign characters of multiple agendas at the privacy of their offices, hotel rooms, and residence.
Though this sub-culture has been under scrutiny for the past 18 months, enforcement has been all but effective. Mainly because these non-transparent and questionable freewheeling often takes place away from the government’s radar.
While the Foreign Policy Association finishes up demolishing the richest continent on earth, the FPA's demon child, the Council on Foreign Relations aids and abets the destruction of the Middle East.
Authors: David Albright, President, Institute for Science and International Security Mark Fitzpatrick, Senior Fellow for Nonproliferation, International Institute for Strategic Studies Daryl Kimball, Executive Director, Arms Control Association Jonathan Pearl, Stanton Nuclear Security Fellow, 2010-2011 Interviewer(s): Jonathan Masters, Associate Staff Writer March 23, 2012
Upcoming talks between Iran and the "P5+1" powers--the United States, the UK, Russia, China, France, and Germany--reportedlyscheduled for April 13 in Geneva present a crucial opening to restart negotiations on Iran's disputed nuclear program (Haaretz).Four nuclear security experts lay out what the priorities should be for the talks:
All agree on the need to address immediate proliferation risks, including halting Iran's accumulation of 20 percent enriched uranium. David Albright of the Washington-based Institute for Science and International Security says the negotiations should focus on laying the groundwork for a long-term accord and reject any Iranian effort to trade short-term concessions for a reduction in sanctions. Mark Fitzpatrick of the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies recommends the international community propose technical measures that make it difficult for Tehran to enrich uranium above 20 percent levels in the future. Daryl G. Kimball of the Arms Control Association argues that a permanent enrichment halt is unrealistic, and says the talks should instead aim to link enrichment capacity to the actual needs of Iran's nuclear power reactors. Jonathan Pearl, a former CFR fellow, says the P5+1 should revisit and update earlier fuel swap proposals in exchange for Iranian concessions.
David Albright, President, Institute for Science and International Security
The goal of upcoming negotiations should be a framework agreement that incorporates a series of stages where each step includes concessions from Iran matched with incentives or concessions from the P5+1. Negotiations should also focus on laying the groundwork for a long-term accord that will likely take several years.
Certain measures deserve priority in the initial negotiations. The first is an Iranian commitment to cap all enrichment at 5 percent and freeze the installation of additional centrifuges at the Qom enrichment plant. Iran could also address at least some IAEA concerns about the military dimensions of its past nuclear efforts.
The United States and its allies should be prepared to provide Iran with commensurate incentives, including the provision of 19.75 percent enriched uranium fuel for its Tehran Research Reactor (TRR); the supply of 19.75 percent low enriched uranium (LEU) targets for medical isotope production in this reactor; a supply of medical isotopes of the type that the TRR would produce; and a commitment by the P5 +1 not to seek new UN Security Council sanctions for a defined period of time. At the same time, the United States and its allies should reject any Iranian effort to trade interim measures for a reduction in sanctions.
Negotiations should also focus on laying the groundwork for a long-term accord that will likely take several years.
In previous negotiations, Iran has sought to establish an essentially unbridled right to uranium enrichment. But the P5+1 is unlikely to acknowledge this without a verified assurance that it is in compliance with the Nuclear Non- Proliferation Treaty, something lacking today.
Updated, verified "freeze for freeze" agreement • Iran coming clean in a verifiable manner about its nuclear weaponization activities, and receiving significant sanctions relief and security guarantees
• Intensive IAEA verification, temporary suspension of sensitive Iranian nuclear programs, and provisional suspension of UN Security Council sanctions
• IAEA certification of absence of undeclared nuclear materials and facilities, end of suspension of Iran's nuclear programs, provision of major incentives package, and end of U.S. sanctions
• Growth of Iran's civil nuclear program and end of all remaining sanctions
Limiting the goal to achieving only interim measures will offer, at best, temporary benefits to the United States and a brief respite from the risk of war. The P5+1 should not leave the outlines of a long-term agreement to future talks.
Mark Fitzpatrick, Senior Fellow for Nonproliferation, International Institute for Strategic Studies
The immediate aim of the upcoming talks is to build confidence that Iran will not be able to make a quick sprint to build nuclear weapons. This will require limits on its nuclear program and greater transparency. The limits mandated by successive UN Security Council resolutions remain the ideal: suspension of the nuclear activities that cause concern. There is no chance, however, that Iran will cave in completely after six years of resisting this demand.
Iran might agree to suspend 20 percent enrichment, as President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad offered last autumn, in exchange for the provision of fuel enriched to that level for the Tehran Research Reactor (TRR). But now that Iran can produce TRR fuel plates on its own, albeit with safety certification problems, his offer may be overtaken by events. Persuading Iran to depart with its stockpile of 20 percent enriched uranium would be even more difficult, although two years ago, at least Iran accepted the principle that a portion of its enriched product could be exported.
Unlike the IAEA, the P5+1 can offer immunity from further penalties if Iran agrees to grant access that might confirm past work on weaponization.
Iran would be more willing to forego steps it has not yet taken, such as enrichment above 20 percent--a move it might someday try to justify on grounds that medical isotopes can be produced more efficiently if targets for the TRR are made of highly enriched uranium (HEU). The P5+1 could offer HEU targets in order to preempt any such excuse. To enhance confidence that enrichment is kept below 20 percent (or, better, 5 percent), technical measures should be proposed that would make it more difficult to adjust centrifuge cascades to enrich at higher levels. The IAEA should also be allowed to detect enrichment levels at Fordow and Natanz on a real-time basis, without only having to rely on sending environmental samples back to Austria for time-consuming analysis.
For increased transparency, Iran should be pressed to follow standard IAEA rules by reporting new facilities before they are built (the Code 3.1 requirement), and to again provisionally implement the Additional Protocol. Iran should also be persuaded to grant IAEA access to facilities, individuals, and documents associated with the alleged nuclear activities with "possible military dimensions," as the IAEA puts it. Unlike the IAEA, the P5+1 can offer immunity from further penalties if Iran agrees to grant access that might confirm past work on weaponization.
Daryl Kimball, Executive Director, Arms Control Association
Iran continues to improve its uranium enrichment capabilities and already has some of the expertise needed to build nuclear weapons. But it is clear that a nuclear-armed Iran is neither imminent nor inevitable.
One high-profile meeting will not, however, produce a long-term deal. Progress requires a sustained, serious dialogue consisting of high-level and technical meetings on a multilateral and bilateral basis.
To begin, the negotiators need to seek agreement on confidence-building steps that address the highest priority proliferation risks. Iran's growing stockpile of 20 percent enriched uranium would allow Iran to shorten its time frame to produce weapons, if it chose to do so. The P5+1 should test Iran's offer to stop enriching to 20 percent if it receives fuel for its Tehran Research Reactor, and secure agreement on the removal of its existing 20 percent enriched uranium stockpile.
Another key objective should be to secure more intrusive IAEA access to all of Iran's nuclear-related sites under the terms of the IAEA Additional Protocol and convince Tehran to finally address the agency's questions about suspected weapons-related work at key sites, including Parchin. This would reduce the risk of clandestine nuclear work and reduce the risk to Iran of even tighter international sanctions.
The long term P5+1 goal should be to limit enrichment levels to normal reactor fuel grade, link enrichment capacity to the actual needs of Iran's nuclear power reactors, and establish a more robust system of inspections.
A permanent uranium enrichment halt, as called for by some, would be ideal, but is not realistic given Iran's existing enrichment capacity and the strong support for enrichment across the Iranian political spectrum.
Rather, the long-term P5+1 goal should be to limit enrichment levels to normal reactor fuel grade, link enrichment capacity to the actual needs of Iran's nuclear power reactors, and establish a more robust system of inspections.
Responsible leaders in Washington, London, Paris and elsewhere understand that sanctions have bought time and improved negotiating leverage, but will not, in isolation, persuade Tehran's leaders to halt their sensitive nuclear activities. They also see that the "military option" would be ineffective and counterproductive. Air strikes on Iran's facilities would set back Iran's program for no more than a couple of years, convince its leaders to pursue nuclear weapons openly, and lead to adverse economic and security consequences.
There is no guarantee that diplomacy and pressure will be effective in convincing Iran's current and future leaders they stand to gain more from forgoing nuclear weapons than from any decision to build them. But it's the best option on the table.
Jonathan Pearl, Stanton Nuclear Security Fellow, 2010-2011
The Obama administration has publicly committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Some ambiguities remain about Washington's red lines, but the failure of a new round of P5+1 negotiations could bring the United States closer to war, whether on its own accord or as aconsequence of Israeli strikes that draw America to the defense of its ally.
Given the stakes, a wide variety of options must be on the table during the upcoming round of talks with Iran, provided the outcome is an effective end to the threat of Iranian weaponization.
As an opening gambit, the United States and its partners should revisit and update earlier fuel swap proposals in exchange for Iranian concessions of immediate importance, including suspending work at the deeply buried Fordow facility as well as halting production of 20 percent enriched uranium. Despite the failure of previous efforts, continually tighteningsanctions on Iran's petroleum and banking sectors and the lingering threat of military strikes might yet force Tehran's hand.
The failure of a new round of P5+1 negotiations could bring the United States closer to war, whether on its own accord or as a consequence of Israeli strikes that draw America to the defense of its ally.
The goal would be to determine whether Tehran is finallywillingand able to compromise, or simply looking to buy time in anticipation of the upcoming IAEA Board of Governors decision on whether to send its file back to the UN Security Council.
If Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei proves amenable to compromise, the P5+1 and Iran could pursue a series of confidence-building measures over the coming months, with strict but realistic deadlines for compliance, and penalties for noncompliance.
The more difficult question is what should be on the table if the P5+1 talks progress to the next stage. Some Iran experts believe that a comprehensive deal will only be possible if it permits Iran to retain, for example, a small-scale uranium enrichment capacity. These terms might seem unpalatable but, interestingly, the Obama administration has not yet ruled out such an option.
Far-reaching discussions are, however, a long way off. Iran could take a first step in that direction by settling its accounts with the IAEA and the UN Security Council, providing IAEA inspectors full access to all sites of interest, and ending its support for terrorist organizations.
Continuous Violations of Human Rights in Palestine
The fourth annual report released today Monday March 19 2012 by the UNHCR has criticized the involvement of Israel, the Palestinian Authority and the de-facto authorities in the Gaza Strip in human rights violations and abuses. The report focused on and exposed the Israeli practices against Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza Strip. The report covers the period from December 1 2010 until November 15 2011. The fourth annual report of the Commissioner on the situation of human rights in Palestine and other occupied Arab territories ” the number of cases documented by UNHCR indicate that the IDF most often uses live ammunition against unarmed Palestinians”.
Khawla Mattar, director of the United Nations Information Center in Cairo said during a press conference to introducing the report: “The “israeli settlers” who continuously violate the rights of Palestinians are tried before civilian courts in Israel while they settle in the Palestinian occupied territories, but the Palestinians are tried before military tribunals for simply protecting their rights. This is a clear violation of Human Rights; it even violates the law in Israel itself”.
Read part of the report which talks about the violations of the Palestinians Rights quoted below. The full report can be read online at the UN website link.
19 March 2012 – The Human Rights Council this morning opened its general debate on the human rights situation in Palestine and Other Occupied Arab Territories after hearing High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay present the report of the Secretary-General of the United Nations and the report of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the topic.
Ms. Pillay said the human rights challenges in the occupied Palestinian territory were intrinsically linked to the continuing expansion of Israeli settlements, including violence by Israeli settlers against Palestinians. The Israeli Government must investigate all incidents of violence against Palestinians and ensure that the perpetrators were held accountable. The High Commissioner urged the Government of Israel to bring its policies and practices in the occupied Palestinian territory in line with its international humanitarian law obligations as the occupying power. On the Palestinian side, there were concerns of arbitrary detention and ill-treatment, especially in Gaza. Palestinian leaders should reinforce safeguards for freedoms of opinion, expression, association and assembly and should demonstrate leadership in securing these freedoms, including for human rights defenders and journalists.
Speaking as a concerned country, Israel said agenda item 7 was actually more correctly understood to be the agenda item for targeting Israel. Israel was certainly not perfect and Israel’s vibrant media and civil society pointed out those mistakes regularly. Life for Palestinians had improved. It was time for the Council to get back to the real work. Work for the people of Syria and Iran and in other places where people’s lives actually depended on the international community taking action.
Palestine, also speaking as a concerned country, said the report proved that Israel had run a policy of daily violations of international human rights and humanitarian law. Settlements were the biggest obstacle to a peace agreement. Israel must immediately start cooperating with the international community and shoulder its responsibilities as an occupying power. The international community must fulfil its responsibilities and have Israel cease the occupation and respect the Fourth Geneva Convention.
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, said the human rights challenges in the occupied Palestinian territory were intrinsically linked to the continuing expansion of Israeli settlements, including violence by Israeli settlers against Palestinians. The Israeli Government must investigate all incidents of violence against Palestinians and ensure that the perpetrators were held accountable. Israel should ensure that Palestinians could easily access Israeli police stations and register complaints.
There were incidents of excessive use of force by Israeli security forces; the Government should cease the use of live ammunition against civilians. The main results of Israel’s blockade of Gaza continued to be poverty, unemployment and the deterioration of health care, education and water and sanitation facilities.
Israeli should facilitate the movement of civilians to and from Gaza, ensure that reconstruction material could be delivered and permit more goods to be exported. The High Commissioner urged the Government of Israel to bring its policies and practices in the occupied Palestinian territory in line with its international humanitarian law obligations as the occupying power. On the Palestinian side, there were concerns of arbitrary detention and ill-treatment, especially in Gaza. Palestinian leaders should ensure any credible allegation of ill-treatment was investigated promptly and impartially.
Palestinian leaders should reinforce safeguards for freedoms of opinion, expression, association and assembly and should demonstrate leadership in securing these freedoms, including for human rights defenders and journalists. The firing of indiscriminate projectiles toward Israel from Gaza was illegal and unjustifiable.
The High Commissioner encouraged Israeli and Palestinian leaders to implement the small steps recommended in her report to not only improve the lives of civilians but also to demonstrate the leaders’ commitment to the goal of living side by side in peace and security.
Possibly related posts (automatically generated):
Thanks to Dublin November 7, 2010 Dear Lord Mayor Gerry Breen, Dear Minister Mr. Micheál Martin, Dear Minister Connor Lenihan, Dear Ambassador Frank...
طفح الكيل وبلغ السيل الزبى هل هذه هي الحدود التي تحدث دكتور نبيل شعث عن حمايتها في فلسطين السلطة الفلسطينية مطالبة بتنظيف سفاراتها من...
Palestine Calendar 2011 Merry Christmas from Bilin The BADIL Resource Center for Palestinian Residency and Refugee Rights announced the 2011 Desk-Calendars which are...
Idan Tal The E-mail below was sent from the so-called “Israel”, the Jewish Agency, the fraud “State” established by an illegal promise...
Question of Palestine Link to the UN News on the Question of Palestine The information below was released by UN Click here to...
Terrorism and revolution are tools of oppression and reigns of terror just like the reign of terror imposed by the English sponsored unlawful invasion of Palestine by the faux Juifs and their hideous oppression of the rightful inhabitants of Palestine, the Palestinians. All oppressors rewrite history to support their genocides: Karl Marx, Theodore Herzl, Iosef Stalin, Adolph Hitler, Mao Tse Tung, Ho Chi Minh, Ben Gurion, Pol Pot, Bibi Netanyahu etc.
May God and all lawful law abiding citizens of the world and all law organs of the world's government come to the aid of the Palestinians now.
Editors note - in the below excerpt, it is quite obvious, given time and context of the use of the word "virtue," a specific meaning only can be meant. (The Machiavellian based English Freethinkers who were imbued with the English predilection for Machiavelli as the base for all "new" "political science" were the base of the Freemasonic French Intelligentsia. That Freemasonic French Intellligentsia was the core of the French Revolution.) The meaning of "virtue" in this context and exactly in terms of the French Revolution is only Machiavelli's meaning that virtue - "virtu," in Machivelli's Italian in which he wrote The Prince and The Discourses, is only the ability to make what the revolutionaries want to happen occur with no moral virtue attached to it at all.
When it first entered public discourse in the West, the word “terrorism” meant the reign of terror the Jacobins imposed in France from the fall of 1793 to the summer of 1794. Its ultimate aim was the reshaping of both society and human nature. That was to be achieved by destroying the old regime, suppressing all enemies of the revolutionary government, and inculcating and enforcing civic virtue. A central role in attaining these objectives was accorded to revolutionary tribunals which had wide authority, were constrained by very few rules of procedure, and saw their task as carrying out revolutionary policy rather than meting out legal justice of the more conventional sort. They went after “enemies of the people”, actual or potential, proven or suspected; the law on the basis of which they were operating “enumerated just who the enemies of the people might be in terms so ambiguous as to exclude no one” (Carter 1989: 142). The standard punishment was death. Trials and executions were meant to strike terror in the hearts of all who lacked civic virtue; the Jacobins believed that was a necessary means of consolidating the new regime. This necessity provided both the rationale of the reign of terror and its moral justification. As Robespierre put it, terror was but “an emanation of virtue”; without it, virtue remained impotent. Accordingly, the Jacobins applied the term to their own actions and policies quite unabashedly, without any negative connotations.
The GUELPH and the GHIBELLINE were the two great rival political factions of mediaeval Italy which originated in Germany, in the rivalry between the house of Guelph – in German, Welf, the Dukes of Saxony and Bavaria, and the Ghibelline, the house of Hohenstaufen, the Dukes of Swabia whose ancestral castle was Waiblingen in Franconia.
The Guelph and the Ghibelline supported opposite sides in the papal, the Guelph side, against the imperial,the Ghiballine side in the contest between the papacy and the Holy Roman Empire. The Bavarian Guelph had the bankers and their power contained within their ranks.
The Byzantine, Russian, French milieu heightened all the rivalries and increased the players.
The English empire building is a direct outgrowth of their Saxon Welf forebears.
Added to that is the Nizari Ishmaeli cult of the assassins brought back from the Crusades by the Knights Templar and the employment by the princes of the European Houses of the Dragon of the Khazar Jews as a mercenary cult within Christendom and the whole die is cast for the next seven centuries until the present for all the horrors that together they foisted upon the world.
The world needs this site translated to ALL languages, and I want you to. If you decide to translate this you will not be able to contact me to tell me, because every time someone does communication gets blocked and I never hear from them again. Please post your translations anywhere you can on the web and save the pictures locally also. This site may not exist for long, and if it vanishes the pictures have to come from somewhere, which could be you.
フクシマ原発を殺したのは（イスラエルの原発管理会社)ディモナ・ドーゼン社か？
Fukushima may in fact have been caused by an act of war under the cover of an environmental disaster.フクシマは自然災害を装った戦争行為だった。
NHK released a bogus report- NHK PULLED IT, PROBABLY IN RESPONSE TO THIS SITE !!! - On Feb 26 2012, claiming they have the first aerial footage of Fukushima when far better aerial footage has been posted on this site since May of 2011! Furthermore, NHK modified their photos! What are they hiding? Well, what is reported here, of course!
DEAR NHK NEWS IN SENDAI JAPAN: If you really cared about the Japanese people, you would show them THIS picture of reactor 3!
I permit and encourage entire site mirrors of all my articles. Copy them and run them as your own; my topics are huge and often need distributed protection.
（簡略版） It took them three hundred years and trillions of dollars to build a theatre of darkness, yet the light of only one match can burn it down. Do not let this light go out. Archive and POST! 彼らは、３００年とゆう歳月と何兆ドルとゆう金を費やすして悪の劇場を築きあげたが、これを終わらせるには、一本のマッチの火でいいのだ！ 火を絶やさないでくれ。頼む、コピーして、保存して、あちこちに貼付けてくれ！ Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist, Updated Tuesday, Feb 28, 2012 ジム・ストーン、フリーランス・ジャーナリスト、2011年12月28日
This is a massive report. If you have troubles understanding it, just look at THIS picture of the vanished reactor, THIS picture of the destroyed facility and THIS picture, of Magna BSP's camera. Then scroll down to the photos of the NON EXISTENT quake damage and seismic charts which prove there was no 9.0 and therefore the very real tsunami could not have been natural. The fact that what happened in Japan did not occur naturally has been very well documented by a skilled investigator, who spent hundreds of hours getting to the bottom of this story.
This report uses classified leaked high resolution photos of the destruction of Fukushima, schematic diagrams of the reactor systems at Fukushima, and the original seismic records to support it's claims.
They are, 資料が示すことは以下のごとし、 1. Reactor 3 is completely missing, which means the press and anyone who has claimed anything about pressures, temperatures, containment, ect about reactor 3 after March 14 are lying and people need to pay attention to it, because failure of the public to realize the massive extent of the lies about what is going on there will leave the door open to a repeat event. （ご覧下さい）３号炉はみごと在りません。消えました。つまり少なくとも３月１４日以降の、圧力がどうの、温度がどうの、汚染がどうのといった、３号炉についてのメデアや諸家のお説はすべて嘘言とゆうことになります。 このことが一番こわい。この（メディア、政府、東電、とその草達の）巨大な丸ごと嘘に、われわれ市民が気づき警戒しないと、また同じ事がくりかえされるからだ。
2. Reactor 4 is Building 7, demolished by explosives. ４号炉は（９１１の３番目に崩れた）７号館と同じ。爆破されたのです。理由は以下。 Reactor 4 had been defueled and was undergoing replacement of it's internal stainless steel shroud, yet blew it's containment anyway. ４号炉の燃料は抜き取ってありました。ステンレスの囲い板を交換中だったのです。しかしいずれにしても貯蔵中の燃料など全て吹っ飛んじゃったのですから、同じ事です。 That is the FINAL smoking gun, an empty reactor is inert, and cannot produce an explosion, yet one happened at 4 that was so powerful it destroyed the structure leaving it in danger of falling over. これが決定的な証拠です。炉は空っぽで、反応も爆発もその材料が炉の中になかったのですから。炉自身の爆発はありえないのです。 しかし覚えていますよね。それがどれほど凄い爆発おこしたか。あわやあの頑強な建物の驅体自体崩壊する寸前までの凄さだったのです。 Overheated open fuel pools cannot produce hydrogen （政府東電等の水素爆発だと説明と説明しましたが） 上部の燃料貯蔵プールは水素を発生するはずがありません。 because in an open fuel pool the water boils off at 100 Celsius, and won't be present in pressurized form at 2,000 degrees Celsius to liberate it's hydrogen by losing it's oxygen to the zircon cladding in the fuel rods. なぜなら、燃料を貯蔵している水槽の水は摂氏１００度で沸騰して蒸発してしまいますから、２０００度に達することはありません。そして２０００度にならないと水は燃料棒をつつむジルコンの鞘と化合して水素を発生することがないのです。
The rods will prefer the free oxygen in the air and burn long before attempting to claim the oxygen in whatever humidity there might be. むしろ燃料棒は、水蒸気から分離した酸素と化合して燃焼するはるか以前に、空気中の水素と反応して燃えてしまうだろう。
Because fuel rods only contain 20 percent fissionable material, they also cannot produce the "prompt criticality"なまた燃料棒はわずか２０％しか核物質を含んでいないので、爆発臨界点 には達しようがないのです。（つまり高名なキョウロンカが国民を恐怖のどん底に叩き込んだようにメルトダウン＝再臨界＝即核爆発とはならないとゆうこと。核爆弾となるにはもっと純度の高いウランが必要とゆうこと．ただし今回核物質、放射能が飛散したことは事実。報道以上のスケールか？ だから起こりえない爆発がどうして起ったのか？ やはり『核』兵器しかありえないとゆうこと。訳者） "The most qualified nuclear engineer in the world" Arnie Gundersen has spoken of.I got to the bottom of the Arnie Gunderson story, and added the results of that investigation further down the page. ”世界最高”の原子技術者のエミー・アンダーソンがそうゆってるんだ。それを徹底的にしらべて得た結論を以下に記すことにする。 He has been put on a pedastal and pumped up enormously by a press that wants a misleading story, all the while he is a despised outcast of the greater engineering community. 彼は事実を曲げた話を求めるメディアによって持ち上げられ巨大にふくまらせられ、今では技術者仲間の中では、軽蔑され追放される身となった。 The explosion at #4 was flatly impossible absent the use of an explosive device, 単純明快に４号炉の爆発は仕込まれた起爆装置なしにはありえない。and as a result the disaster at Fukushima is FAR FAR WORSE than ANYTHING Gundersen is willing to say. そしてその結果はガンダーセンが言わんとするところより遥かに遥かに深刻なのだ。
Gundersen is towing the line and hiding the true magnitude of what happened there because if it became widely known serious questions would be asked. ガンデダーセンは線を引いて、深刻な事態を隠している。When have you heard Gundersen talk about a totally missing reactor? 彼が消えた原子炉について話したことがありますか？（以下の青字をクリックすれば、『原子炉４号の上蓋は燃料抜き取りのために取り外されている』）無人偵察機からの写真
Reactor 4's dome was removed for defueling. （青字＝原子炉４号機の上蓋は燃料抜き取りのために取り除かれている）Drone photos prove it.無人偵察機ドローンからの写真がそれを証明している。 This dispels the rumors surrounding unit 4's explosion.これは４号機にまつわる噂を追い払う。 Some people have said that this reactor was secretly in operation to enrich plutonium. ご承知のごとく、ある人々はこの炉でプルトニュームの濃縮作業が行われていた言っていた。This photo proves it was disassembled for shroud replacement as stated. しかしこの写真を見れば鞘の入れ替えのための解体作業と分かる。Tepco is going out of it's way trying to explain the explosions, especially at reactor 4, because they did indeed occur, so an explanation is needed. As a result, they are giving reasons that cannot happen, just to say something. They need to see this post and get the Arava perspective(Arava is a district surrounding Dimona). 東電は爆発の説明そのものを終わりにしようとしている。特に４号機について。とゆうのは、実際爆発は起ったのだし、だとするとその本当の理由を説明しなければおかしいからである。彼らはわれわれのこの写真と記事を見るべきだし、アルバに事態の成り行きを知らしめるべきだ。（アルバはディモナ社のある地域の名前。政府官公庁のかわりに”霞ヶ関”と言う類い） 3. That the destruction of the facility is so severe it could only have been accomplished with nuclear weapons. あの この破壊の凄まじさを説明しえるのは唯一核爆弾の使用しかありえない。（日本のメディアが使用してきた写真はスケール感を故意に消しているので、これらの建物の巨大さ、コンクリートの厚さとか柱梁の頑丈さなどは分からないが、ドローンが撮った敷地全体の破壊写真に著者が貼付けた自動車を見れば、それが非常によくわかる。また米軍が携行しているマニュアルも素晴しい。また著者（元CIA原発等技術関係者）は東電の管理体制を非常に高く評価している。建物決してペラペラの安物でないし、管理もヘナチョコデタラメではなかったらしい。訳者）
Hydrogen produces a non-ideal subsonic explosion. It cannot turn concrete into dust. 水素爆発は非理想型の亜音速爆発であって、コンクリートを粉々にすることは出来ない。 It can produce high pressures if sealed off, but the metal roof on all the reactor containments should have provided the relief and been the only thing destroyed.確かに密閉されれば高圧にはなるけれど、メタルの屋根はむしろ圧力抜きになってそれ自体が吹き飛ぶだけなはずだ。
It takes a high intensity explosive to strip concrete off rebar, a blast wave many times faster than supersonic. ４号機のように鉄筋コンクリートの鉄筋とコンクリートをバラバラに分離破壊するには亜音速の何倍かの速度を持つ衝撃波が必要なのです。
This means that whatever happened at Fukushima did not have blast characteristics that fit the "official" story. つまり福島で実際何が起こったにせよ、それは政府や東電の公の説明に合致するような爆裂ではなかったのだ。If you missed it in the high resolution photo of the destroyed facility, I took a car that was laying around in the remains and placed it on top of one of the blown away walls at reactor 3, which clearly gives the reference that the walls had support columns at least 15 feet thick.この高解像度の建物破壊映像を見てもその意味が分からない人のために、そのあたりに吹き飛ばされていた自動車を３号炉の破壊された壁の上にはりつけてあるから見て欲しい。この比較から壁の厚さは少なくても４．５mはあることがわかる。
Fukushima was built with the Mark 1 containment design,フクシマはマーク１型容器で設計されているが but beyond Mark 1 standards which was a common upgrade実際はそれを超える基準で建設されていたし現在は一様にこの程度には設計基準がアップされている。(reference is the included photos, it is obviousこの比較も写真の中に示したから、見ればあきらかだ). It is true that gas explosions can be very destructive, 確かに水素爆発は非常に強力だけれどもbut only in facilities that were not designed to handle them.それはそのように設計されていない建物の場合で、 Even the basic mark 1 containment was many times beyond capable of withstanding the worst hydrogen blast.実際、改訂以前の基本型マーク１さえ最悪の水素爆発の耐えられる何倍かの強度で設計建設されていた。
4. That nuclear weapon(s) were placed inside of the reactor containment(s) disguised as security cameras installed under contract this year by Arava based security firm Magna BSP (Arava is a district around Dimona, not a city.) それでは問題の核兵器（複数の可能性）はどこに誰が取り付けたのか？ それは原子炉格納容器の内側に容器内監視カメラを装ってとりつけられたのだ。取り付けたのはイスラエルのアラバ地区にあるマグナBSPと言う名の安全管理会社である。（アラバはディモナある地域の名称で都市名ではない）
Their "security cameras" weighed over 1,000 pounds and were the size and shape of gun type nuclear weapons.問題の”監視カメラ”は、重さおおよそ５００キロで形状は銃型核兵器（上記青字をクリック）に酷似している。（筆者は監視カメラがそんなに大きく重い必要はないとしてオバケ（モンスタラス）カメラと揶揄している。訳者）
The reason Magna BSP gave for the odd shape, enormous weight, and giant proportions of their cameras was that they were stereoscopic.マグナBSP社のカメラが何故こんな変な格好でこんなに重くこんなに大きいのかといえば、それが立体カメラだからである。 They have creatively called them bi-scopic so when you search on google their monstrous cameras are the only thing that comes up (outside of Dj lighting and a gun scope) 彼らはこれを双眼映像と名付けているが的を得ている。とにかくグーグルでこのオバケカメラを検索してみるといい。（Dj用タイトと銃に付ける照準の外側？）に見つけられるのは唯一つこれだけだ（？訳者）。Try it. 試してみるといい。 Type "Biscopic camera" into google images,(without the quotes) it's a hoot! とのかくgoogle imageにbiscopicと打ち込んでみてください。ぷーっと吹き出したくなるっでしょう。This helps marketing I guess.確かにマーケッティングには役たつかもしれない。 The need for such a large stereoscopic camera could be plausible at an airstrip, where the camera would need depth perception out miles, but not indoors where focal lengths are short. しかし何キロとゆう長距離の焦点深度を正確に読みとらなければ成らない飛行機の滑走 用とゆうのであれば、この馬鹿でかい立体カメラは説明がつくけとしても、室内用にはまったく必要ない。Other manufacturers have units appropriate for indoor focal lengths which are only twice the size of ordinary monocular security cameras. 他の会社が出している室内用の距離計は普通の単眼監視カメラの２倍の大きさにすぎない。Depth perception going out miles could also be accomplished with two separately mounted cameras weighing only a few pounds; the giant thousand pounder is a dead giveawayまた何キロとゆう長い距離を測るにしても二台のカメラを併置すればことたりわけでこんな重たい必要はまったくない. Magna does make passive radar systems which require a large body, マグナ社は確かに図体のでかい受動レーダシステムを製作している。しかしbut the owl could accomplish it's claimed function with two small lightweight cameras (5 or so lbs, not tiny) and the processor in a modern laptop. 在野の俺らフクロウならそれぐらいのことは２、３キロの軽量のカメラ２台とラップトップと電波を飛ばすモデムで済ますね。Why this giant thing? 答えていただこうか？どうし君のカメラはそんなに大きいのだね、マグナ君？ note - a not yet produced graphical model is what you see most on Google, the ones produced thus far are ugly boxes. 註：未だグーグル用の解説図解が出来ていないそうだ。とゆうわけで、実際に製作使用されたものは、はるかに醜い醜い邪悪な代物とゆうわけだ。どうかねマグナ君。
. . . . . . . . . .9/11, 4/11, 3/11? see a pattern? Let's not see a 6/11. Your time and effort in spreading the word may really make a difference. ９１１、４１１、３１１、皆さんこのパターンわかりますよね。 ６１１は何としても防がなければー。 だから一刻も早くこのことを伝えて！ 最速拡散お願い！！ 時間が勝負 ！！ （差し当たっての）敵は、皆様お好みおなじみのD六さんとかロス茶さんではなかったわけ。イスラエルの戦闘的シオニスト（ひ。。。よっとすると旧ナチかもよ）でした。目からウロコ？ 裏でつながってる？ もちろんカモね。One World、 One Government, One Money- 世界はヒトツ。人類はカゾク。カチク？だったかな。
Due to the many positive e-mails about getting the truth out, rather than hold back I am going to put the original information back. It follows below. 各方面から裏付けもとれたので、ここで一挙オリジナル上演と行こう。
The quake was not what we were told.
311地震は我々が教えられたものと全く違う。In fact, the quake was a bold faced lie, packing a political agenda. 事実、今回の地震は、オクメンなき『嘘』。 地政学的傑作！ There is even more proof now, and it goes beyond the linked Japanese chart. 上記英文青字リンク先にリンクして日本発表の震度地図を見てほしい。 This original seismic data is the smoking gun,この日本側の地震データは現場に残された決定的な証拠だ。 however, I have something better.しかし私の手元にはもうちょっとマシなものがある。 I finally suppressed the urge to vomit and analyzed the lies told by the USGS, ずーと我慢して来た反吐が出るおもいを堪えて合衆国地理院が提供するウソを分析することにする。and from them wrote this sad, sad story about how it really was, not what you will see in the video. そして、皆さんがヴィデオで見るものでなく、本当は何が起ったのかについて、悲しい悲しい心底悲しい話をしなければならない。 Keep in mind that precise top speeds of flying debris cannot be determined with accuracy, but this story will at least be close to the numbers put out by the USGS. ９１１の超高速で飛び散ったとゆわれる飛行機の残骸を正確に確定はできないけれど、少なくても今回のケースは米国地理院の提供する数値に近い。
The people in the newsroom did not die, ご覧下さい。ニューズルームで仕事していた人々は死んでなかったのです。this story is what would have happened if the USGS charts were true. 米国地理院のチャートが真実なら当然彼らは死んでいなければならないのです。 Meet Atsuo, Airi, and Akiyoshi. それではアツオ氏、アイリさん、アキヨシ氏を紹介します。 They were all the best and most dedicated people at the NHK newsroom, in Sendai Japan. 彼らはNHK仙台支局の優秀な職員で献身的に仕事をしています。 Akiyoshi loved Airi, and Atsuo was the one who introduced them.アキヨシ氏はアイリさんを愛しています。アツオ氏がこの二人を紹介してくれたのです． Unfortunately, all 3 died in the quake.Akiyoshi got a severe cut and bled to death when he hit a display screen behind him at 44 miles an hour,不幸にもこの３人は死にました。アキヨシ氏は時速６０キロで後方から飛んできたモニターに打たれて出血多量で死亡、崩壊した壁の穴から放り出された。and was then thrown out through a hole in a collapsed wall. Airi followed pretty much the same path, and died beside him in the rubble. アイリさんも同じようにしてガレキのなか彼の側で死にました．Atsuo flew through the open door behind him,アツオ氏は、後ろの開いていたドアから放り出され、 then crashed through a window 窓に激突、and was crushed when he landed in a massive seismic crack in the road, 道路に口を開けた巨大な大地の割れ目に投げ込まれ、which closed in on him. そして大地は閉じたのです． Others in the newsroom died also, but I never thought up names for them. ニューズルームにいた他の人々もみんな死にました。無名のまま。
At least, according to the official USGS charts. 少なくとも、米国地理院発表の”公式 ”地震波動チャートにもとづけば、これぐらいのことは起るはずなのです。 The laser printer was never found, but the table it was on ended up on top of the rubble, smashed to pieces, where one of the few survivors used a piece of the metal frame to splint his broken leg. レーザープリンターは発見されませんでした。机は粉粉になって瓦礫の山の上にありました。瓦礫の山の上では、生存者が骨折した足に机の足をくくり付けていました。トイッタトコロカナー 写真中の文章： Chart prepared by Erol Kalkan, Ph.D. USGS, Official Release. 米国地理院公式発表エロール・カルカン博士作成 According to these chart, every one in the room hit the East Wall at 44 MPH, and then bounced to the South at 28 MPH. Every one died. このチャートにもとづくなら、部屋の全員は時速６０キロで東の壁に激突、それから時速２８キロで南の壁にバウンス、全員死亡確実。 The leaser printer, AFTER those "graphs" !!??!! ONE HAPPY PRINTER!! ヘ～！！？？！！ このグラフが示す地震でレーザープリンンターが健全とわね。オドロキモモノキ！！？？！！オメデトウ プリンター
The video below is the one I pulled the frames out of for the sad, sad story. It is a video of a newsroom at the hardest hit area in Japan, and it SAYS IT ALL. This is when the quake was happening live. They are alarmed there is an earthquake, but most people stay seated in their chairs. 下のビデオは、日本であの時、最も強く揺さぶられたはずの仙台のニューズルームの生ビデオです。いいですか、M９の震源地の真近ですよ。M⑨ですよ！たいしたことないですね。ぴんぴん。部屋もみなさんもご健在。私の悲しい悲しい話の筋書きの中核です。
Some people even keep typing on their computers as the quake happens.
Also, note that most of the stuff stays on the desks, at the end, a laser printer is still sitting on a cheap table, ect. よくご覧下さい。ほぼ全員各自のデスクに座って仕事をしています。プリンターも部屋の片隅の安物の机の上に鎮座していますね．some things fall but things return to normal quickly棚や机から落ちたものはすばやくもとにもどしてますよね。
all the while the English announcer is reading a script of devastation with all the pep of some paid fool who does not believe what he is saying in a cheezy infomercial. 一方、お聞き下さい。英語のアナウンサー。連中は金をもらって、信じてもいないことをペラペラ台本どうりに根拠の無い被害状況を調子良くしゃべるんです。
The quake was significant, but only in a 6.0 sense, as recorded by the seismographs.確かに地震はそれなりの者でしたが、6.0程度です。地震計が示すと通りです。
This is important footage, これは、とても重要な映像記録です。
because it proves the earthquake measured at a 6.8 was an instrumentation based richter reading. 6.8と記録された地震はレクタースケール（マグニチュード）で計測さてたものであることをしめしています。
Confusion between the Shindo and Richter scale is being used to cover this up . 震度とレクター（マグニチュード）の混乱が真相隠蔽のために使われているのです。
I chose this video because it's location is documented to have been the worst affected, and was recorded in a news room with a known fixed location. 私がこのビデオを証拠として選ぶのは、被害の最もひどかった場所として報じられたところだからです。ご丁寧にも、都合良く、ニューズウームのなかであり固定カメラで撮られています。This video gets deleted off youtube occasionally, if it does not work check back later and I might have re-linked it. このYouTubeビデオはしばしば消されますが、私も負けずにアップロードし続けますので、また後でクリックしてみて下さい。
Remember that this video is proof of what really went on. このビデオは実際何がおこったのかをしめしています。 This means there never were significant aftershocks, never was a natural tsunami, このビデオによればぶり返しはいっさいありませんでした。自然発生の津波はもちろんありません。 and if they lied about that, what else? 彼らが嘘をついているなら、次はなんでしょうか？ This video is pivotal and vital to exposing the truth. このビデオこそ、真実を露呈するのに鍵となる強力な証拠です。 Sure there was a quake, but at this newsroom it was not much over a six if it even was a six. 地震が発生したのは事実です。しかしこのニューズルームの揺れは６をこえません。まあ６と言ってもいいですがー I chose this video because the news room is within eyeshot of station MYG012, 私がこのビデオをつかうのはもう一つの理由はこのニューズルームからは地震観測地点（MYG012）が手に取るように見えるからです。 which was used by the USGS to make these graphs which represent an 8.8, そして合衆国地理院もこのここです8.8を演出するグラフをねつ造したのです。 as was stated in this (English) newscast and was probably used as a guide to fudge the lie due to the closeness of the newsroom to the seismic station. このアメリカ人のニューズキャスターが述べているように、そして多分、ニューズルームと地震観測所の距離的近さからして『嘘』の上塗りにはうってつけだったのだ。 Looking at these charts,チャートをみてみよう。 it is super easy to get a rough guess at how fast people would have flown.これを見れば人々がどれだけの速度でどっちに吹っ飛んだか 誰にも超簡単に分かるようになっている。44MPH to the North, and 28MPH to the East. つまり私が書いた物語のようにように、北に時速６０キロ、東に時速３０キロと言う具合．お分かり？ Those are not precise numbers but the charts are proven wrong by the video because according to the charts people should have entered uncontrolled flight. 数字が正確でないことは当然としても、チャート自体がビデオによって否定されているわけだです。なぜ？ チャートが正しければ、当然人間は吹っ飛んでなければならないはずですから。 Here is the full chart put out by the USGS Of course, they offer no reading from MYG011, which was closest to the 9.0 "epicenter" by a long shot,勿論のことながら、彼らは『震源地』にもっとも近いMYG011観測所のデータは発表しかせん。 because it only got a 5.63's worth of shaking. I will do that work for them. That map is below. 何故か? 計測値はたったの5.68だったのです。 彼らにかわって私が説明しましょう。下の地図をご覧下さい。 I challenge ANYONE to send me pictures of this quake showing me devastation in an area not hit by the tsunami. どなたでも結構です。津波が来る以前に今回の地震で崩れた家やビルがあったら是非教えて下さい。（東北大学の皮肉にも建築棟が倒れた。他は大丈夫。ガラスいっぱいのメディアテークの天井が落ちたがガラスは一枚も落ちてない。世界一最先端の正常ならざる構造もOK. -訳者） All we have, all the pictures are tsunami damage. これらの写真で見る限り被害は全て津波によるものであって、地震によりものではありません。 Let's see pictures of quake damage. 地震被害の写真を見てみよう。 The Kobe quake was a 6.9/7.2 depending on source. 神戸震災は6.9もしくは 7.2です。 That makes this quake, at a 9.0 100X as powerful. 仙台はM９なら、エネルギーとしては２桁つまり１００倍なのだ。 Sendai was near the epicenter and would have been devastated if it really happened.だからそれが本当にM９なら震源地に近い仙台は壊滅していてしかるべきなのだが Look at the earthquake photos of damage from the Kobe quake, and try to find ONE THING SIMILAR in SENDAI. Just try.一つでもいい、神戸と共通するものがありますか？ They do not exist. それが全くみつからないのです。 Outside of the tsunami, the quake which supposedly hit Sendai with many times the power of the one in Kobe, did not destroy a single building there. Sendai was only 48 miles from the epicenter of this "9.0" which would have devastated everything in an area 1,000 miles across if it was real. All of Japan would be toast. Try to find a photo of seismic damage in Sendai. I challenge you. Try to find it in any of the coastal cities, as little as 25 miles from the "epicenter". I looked for 5 hours, and except for some tanks that fell at a brewery not a single one exists. No pictures of collapsed skyscrapers or high rises equals NO 9.0. You will not find a single skyscraper photo where the windows got broken either. You will find no downed power poles, no flipped over cars, no uprooted trees, no derailed trains (except for one the tsunami hit), and the road damage is typical of even a 5.0. You will not find pictures of a single damaged multi story building or even a structurally damaged wood framed house outside the tsunami zone. In Sendai the quake messed up grocery stores and kitchens and that really is about it.
And now, I will say it like I knew it had to be.
I believe the phony 9.0 story was used as seismic cover for a tsunami nuke, which produced the tsunami of a 9.0 when detonated in the Japan trench (where no earthquakes of significance happen) as punishment for Japan offering to enrich uranium for Iran. The rest of the story, the concealment, is black ops. Bet on it. In the tsunami videos, the tsunami rips through pristine and undamaged cities, where business as usual is obvious and the tsunami is an ambush; not 9.0 earthquake ravaged debris. The quake is a paper thin story taped together by the undeserved trust of a gullible public. And the stories? The CIA did not hire a million people last year for nothing. If there is evidence of a 9.0 SHOW ME. A 9.0 will devastate an area over 1,000 miles across. That is how big a 9.0 is. The entire nation should be in ruins, especially judging from the damage the 6.9 Kobe quake did, and no where, no where outside the tsunami zone in the entire country is there a single damaged multi story building, a single collapsed bridge, a single structurally damaged wood framed house, or skyscraper. If a picture exists that can be definitively pinned to this quake, show me. The only collapsed structure in all of Japan was an old welfare shelter near station MYG004, the true epicenter.
Take a look at these frame captures,次の映像を見て下さい。 and ask a question - Why is no one trying to run?そして自問して下さい。 Why are the cars all just parked peacefully as the tsunami arrived? 津波が近づいているのにどうして駐車場に整然と車が並んでいるのでしょう？ （皆さん整然と車を捨てて高台に避難し終わったのでしょうか？） Why was there no warning? どうして警報が鳴っていないのですか？ Why did the tsunami sirens only go off after the tsunami arrived? どうしてサイレンは津波が来てからようやく鳴りだしたのですか？ Could it be that the people and the governement had not felt a significant earthquake and did not measure one either? あの程度の地震であんな大型の津波が来るとは誰も思わなか ったのではなでしょうか？ だから対策をとらなかったのではないでしょうか？ 下記写真上部の英文訳： この映像を見て、日本中の誰も不思議に思わなかったこと：津波がくる寸前まで建物には傷一つないとゆうこと。完全無傷です。（この少し前にＭ9.0の激震、関西の１００倍のエネルギーに襲われたハズですね） 私の結論は、吾が親愛なる（勿論反語）イルミナティ・シオニスト・ファシスト・（ネオナチ・旧ナチ第３帝国連合・ワンワールド）のメディアがこの犯罪現場について一切だれにも語らないことにしたのです。 日本政府はのど元に短刀を突きつけられていたのです。
Could it be that the people and government were not expecting one? 人々もお役人も地震の規模からして、こんな大型津波がくるなんて思っていないのではありませんか？
Tsunami sirens blare only when it arrives, 津波警報のサイレンは津波が見えてから鳴り始めましたよ。YouTubeをもう一度調べてください。
rather than 40 minutes before, 警報は４０分前に発令されたとゆうことですが、サイレンがなりはじめたのは津波が視野にはいってからでした。
which is how much warning they would have had if a real quake in the ocean had been detected. もし本当に最初の超大型地震M９が本当に海底に確認されたのなら、警報はこんなものではないはずだとおもうのですが。もっと必死になるはずです。
Consider that. Parking lots full of cars, everyone at work, no one trying to leave.よく見て考えて下さい。駐車場には車が整然と並んでいます。みんな働いています。誰も職場をはなれません。（しかしそのおかげで３階以上のビルに留まった人が助かり、路に出た人が波にさらわれた。ことを著者は知るべきだが、沿岸部の建物が地震の被害をうけていないのは写真がしめしている。それがM９でなかったことはめいりょうだ。より内陸の仙台市内の建物では、東北大学の建築科の校舎が座屈倒壊した。他の学科の建物がほぼ無傷とゆうのは皮肉である。また世界最先端の構造によって今日世界で最も尊敬されている伊東豊雄氏設計のメディアテークの天井が落下した。アメリカ渡来のこの吊り天井は元来揺れに弱い。これと同じ天井落下は仙台市内でも東京都内でも等しくみられた。今回の人工地震の震動挙動が天然地震と異なっていたのかもしれない。アメリカ渡来のハリボテ簡易天井とはいえ、日本での施行は地震時の部材挙動とつり金具の強度は計算されているはずだからである。ただしガラスの落下がなかったことは日本の建設技術の優秀さをしめすものだ．訳者） .
AMBUSH!！！ 不意打ちだ！！
When people keep typing at their keyboards during the quake, it's obviously not what we were told. 地震の最中も日本の人々がもくもくとキーボードにむかってタイプする手を止めなかったなどとゆうことは、世界は教えられていません。全く。（文化の違いでしょうか？）
RUSH UPDATE, May 28
５月２８日緊急改訂
When reviewing the seismic data for the supposed 9.0, M９の根拠とされる地震データを調べて分かったことがあります。 I knew there were instead 3 small simultaneous inland epicenters. それは、地震は、海底ではなく、内陸３カ所で同時におこされほ小さな地震だとゆうことです。 This made me suspicious right from the start that the quake was artificially triggered and used as seismic cover for a tsunami bomb. これは、地震は人工的におこしたもので、その目的は、津波の本当の震源が核爆発だったことを隠すためでわないだとゆう私の最初の直感が正しかったとゆうことです。 But I needed a reason to believe an artificial quake could have been done. しかし私は、人工地震が実際使われたとゆうことを信じるにたる証拠が欲しかったのです。 I suspected that either Japan was testing nukes and Israeli intelligence was onto it and used the tests as the "start of clock" for their operation, 一時は、日本が核の地下実験をしようとしているのを嗅ぎつけたイスラエルの工作員がこれにタイミングを合わせて津波を起こして、日本の核の野望を挫くとゆう目的をたっしようとしたのだと考えたこともありました。 or Israel managed to smuggle nukes into lava tubes and tunnels far underground to trigger earthquakes and contain the blasts. あるいは、イスラエルがこっそりと核を日本に持ち込み溶岩の筒やトンネルを掘って埋め込み地震の引き金をひいたと考えました。 So I was hunting for tunnels and lava tubes near each of the three epicenters, and wanted to find them before writing this into this report. 私は地震波の分析から最初の３発の震源地点をわりだして知っていましたから、そのあたりに竪坑や花崗岩の筒がないかとさがしまわっていたのです。 As it turns out, I did not need to.しかし、そんなことをしなくてもよくなりました。次をクリックしてください。１９９７年、国防長官ウイリアム・コヘンが（上院で？）行った軍事報告です。これによれば、１９９７年の時点でEM兵器（強力な電磁兵器でこれを遮ることはことは出来ないと言われている）は実用化されており、これを使えば地震を起こすことも火山を爆発させることもごく簡単にできるとゆう証言です。 This military briefing with Secretary of Defense William Cohen, dated all the way back to 1997! shows that even then, Cohen knew about EM weaponry that could trigger quakes and set off volcanoes. I have ignored everything regarding this subject, I thought it was realm of kooks.以前からEM兵器については知っていましたが、まともに受け取るべきものではないと考えていました。 I thought EM weaponry would be effective in weather modification only, 私はEM 兵器は気象操作ぐらいにしか役に立たないと考えていましたが、そうだったのかどうか、ここで国防長官と議論するつもりはありません。but I am not going to argue with the Secretary of Defense. There are obviously then, energy technologies which have never been publicized, such weaponry would need far more energy input than the electrical grid could provide. 当時は明らかに、一般の知るところではありませんでしたが、兵器たりえるエネルキー技術は、当時の総合電力システムが供給可能を越えるものとかんがえられていたのです。 And the systems Cohen spoke of in 1997 would be outdated now. （現在ではそれははるかに改良され）コーヘンが１９９７年に語ったことは過去のもとなったのです。 Cohen statedコーヘン長官発言: "Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism 敵はエコタイプのテロ技術を開発中ですwhereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.電磁波を使って気候を変えたり地震を起こしたり火山を爆発させたりできるのです So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there 極めて多数の才能ある連中が参加して、that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations.他国に恐怖を引き起こす技術を開発中なのです。 It's real,それは事実です。 and that's the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, だから我々も努力を加速させなければならないのです。and that's why this is so important.それがいかに重要かとゆうことです。 - William S. Cohen, Secretary of Defense, April 28, 1997. Left unsaid by William Cohen is that such systems would be developed by DARPAand owned by America first! ウイリアム・コーヘンがここで言わなかったことが重要なのです。それはその技術をダーパ社（上記青字）が開発してアメリカが先手をとって所有することだったのです。 I would expect with 14 years of advancement that these technologies could now trigger devastating earthquakes in non-seismic zones私はうかつでした。１４年の歳月は地震の起るはずの無い地域に地震をおこす引き金をひく技術を開発するに充分だったのです.
The following picture is the strongest reading for this quake on any seismogram anywhere in Japan.次の地震地図は他のいかなる地震地図より今回実際なにが起ったかのかをハッキリしめしています。 This was before the lie machine got running smoothly.これは『巨大情報操作』が本格的に展開される以前のものである。 Early on there were a few sputters and this REAL chart got out. これ以前にも散発的に情報はもれていたが、ついにこの『本物』があらわれたのです。 As you can see on this chart, it was a 6.67 on the Richter scale, (not shindo scale, confirmed by PGA reference) ごらんのように、内陸の最高値は、MYG004地点のレクタースケール（マグニチュード）6.64です。いわゆる『震度』ではありません。PGA(地動最大加速度）の値から判断して、これはレクター尺度であ って『震度』ではありません(図の後の文中にリンクされている著者が引用する防災科学技術研究所のデータでは『震度』と明記されているが、表の中のこの文字は不自然に挿入されている。ー訳者）（PGA値から判断してこの数値はマグニチュードであって『震度』ではないとゆうこと。 つまり『震度』は後からとってつけたウソとゆうこと．表中の慌ただしくとって付けたように挿入されている『震度」ゆう文字の不自然さがうなずける） This would fit in with NO structural damage in Sendai and the level of shaking in the video. この水準なら、仙台の建物に構造的被害が無いことも、揺れがあの程度なこともうなずけます。
(図中英文訳）観測地点MYG004でPGA(地動最大加速度＝地震力）が最大を記録している。これを記録したのはKNET(防災科学技術研究所）のステーションは栗原近辺にある。（実際は栗原市築館町） This quake was initially asessed a 6.8, 地震は最初8.6と評価されていた。 and the seismic data will show anyone the epicenter was inland, not at sea. そして防災科学研究所のデータ（前記青字クリック）を見れば、誰の目にも、震源地は内陸であって、海底ではないと分かる。 訳者＝このデータはとても面白い。PGA値つまり地震の加速度が高い値が内陸に広い範囲に分散している。宮城県(栗原市）築館2765.2 宮城県塩竈1970.3 宮城県仙台1807.4 茨城県日立1844 茨城県鉾田1613.8 全観測地点中PAG最高値を示す築館町（MYG004)は宮城県栗原市にあるが、震源地から遠い内陸の山地であ。 So it started a 6.8, then got upgraded to a 7.9, then got upgraded to an 8.4, then got upgraded to an 8.8, then got upgraded to a 9.0, and had the epicenter put out in the ocean. Now many are saying it was a 9.1 which would bump up MYG011's number to 1200 from 1070, and it is all based on tsunami effects, not seismic data. The following seismograms clearly show epicenters from 3 separate small quakes all occuring simultaneously. This is what would be expected of an attack, rather than a natural occurence.
It took them three hundred years and trillions of dollars to build a theatre of darkness, yet the light of only one match can burn it down. Do not let this light go out. Archive and POST! Jim Stone, Freelance Journalist, Updated Wednesday, Dec 28, 2011 This is a massive report. If you have troubles understanding it, just look at THIS picture of the vanished reactor, THIS picture of the destroyed facility and THIS picture, of Magna BSP's camera. Then scroll down to the photos of the NON EXISTENT quake damage and seismic charts which prove there was no 9.0 and therefore the very real tsunami could not have been natural. The fact that what happened in Japan did not occur naturally has been very well documented by a skilled investigator, who spent hundreds of hours getting to the bottom of this story.
NEW INFO: Japan offered to enrich uranium for IRAN!
This report uses classified leaked high resolution photos of the destruction of Fukushima originally posted on Pink Tentacle to support its claims.
They are, 1. Reactor 3 is completely missing, which means the press and anyone who has claimed anything about pressures, temperatures, containment, ect about reactor 3 after March 14 are lying and people need to pay attention to it, because failure of the public to realize the massive extent of the lies about what is going on there will leave the door open to a repeat event. 2. Reactor 4 is Building 7, demolished by explosives. Reactor 4 had been defueled and was undergoing replacement of it's internal stainless steel shroud, yet blew it's containment anyway. That is the FINAL smoking gun, an empty reactor is inert, and cannot produce an explosion, yet one happened at 4 that was so powerful it destroyed the structure leaving it in danger of falling over. Overheated open fuel pools cannot produce hydrogen because in an open fuel pool the water boils off at 100 Celsius, and won't be present in pressurized form at 2,000 degrees Celsius to liberate it's hydrogen by losing it's oxygen to the zircon cladding in the fuel rods. The rods will prefer the free oxygen in the air and burn long before attempting to claim the oxygen in whatever humidity there might be. Because fuel rods only contain 20 percent fissionable material, they also cannot produce the "prompt criticality" "The most qualified nuclear engineer in the world" Arnie Gundersen has spoken of. I got to the bottom of the Arnie Gunderson story, and added the results of that investigation further down the page. He has been put on a pedastal and pumped up enormously by a press that wants a misleading story, all the while he is a despised outcast of the greater engineering community. The explosion at #4 was flatly impossible absent the use of an explosive device, and as a result the disaster at Fukushima is FAR FAR WORSE than ANYTHING Gundersen is willing to say. Gundersen is towing the line and hiding the true magnitude of what happened there because if it became widely known serious questions would be asked. When have you heard Gundersen talk about a totally missing reactor? Reactor 4's dome was removed for defueling. Drone photos prove it. This dispels the rumors surrounding unit 4's explosion. Some people have said that this reactor was secretly in operation to enrich plutonium. This photo proves it was disassembled for shroud replacement as stated. Tepco is going out of it's way trying to explain the explosions, especially at reactor 4, because they did indeed occur, so an explanation is needed. As a result, they are giving reasons that cannot happen, just to say something. They need to see this post and get the Arava perspective(Arava is a district surrounding Dimona). 3. That the destruction of the facility is so severe it could only have been accomplished with nuclear weapons. Hydrogen produces a non-ideal subsonic explosion. It cannot turn concrete into dust. It can produce high pressures if sealed off, but the metal roof on all the reactor containments should have provided the relief and been the only thing destroyed. It takes a high intensity explosive to strip concrete off rebar, a blast wave many times faster than supersonic. This means that whatever happened at Fukushima did not have blast characteristics that fit the "official" story. If you missed it in the high resolution photo of the destroyed facility, I took a car that was laying around in the remains and placed it on top of one of the blown away walls at reactor 3, which clearly gives the reference that the walls had support columns at least 15 feet thick. Fukushima was built with the Mark 1 containment design, but beyond Mark 1 standards which was a common upgrade(reference is the included photos, it is obvious). It is true that gas explosions can be very destructive, but only in facilities that were not designed to handle them. Even the basic mark 1 containment was many times beyond capable of withstanding the worst hydrogen blast. 4. That nuclear weapon(s) were placed inside of the reactor containment(s) disguised as security cameras installed under contract this year by Arava based security firm Magna BSP (Arava is a district around Dimona, not a city.) Their "security cameras" weighed over 1,000 pounds and were the size and shape ofgun type nuclear weapons.The reason Magna BSP gave for the odd shape, enormous weight, and giant proportions of their cameras was that they were stereoscopic. They have creatively called them bi-scopic so when you search on google their monstrous cameras are the only thing that comes up (outside of Dj lighting and a gun scope) Try it. Type "Biscopic camera" into google images,(without the quotes) it's a hoot! This helps marketing I guess. The need for such a large stereoscopic camera could be plausible at an airstrip, where the camera would need depth perception out miles, but not indoors where focal lengths are short. Other manufacturers have units appropriate for indoor focal lengths which are only twice the size of ordinary monocular security cameras. Depth perception going out miles could also be accomplished with two separately mounted cameras weighing only a few pounds; the giant thousand pounder is a dead giveaway. Magna does make passive radar systems which require a large body, but the owl could accomplish it's claimed function with two small lightweight cameras (5 or so lbs, not tiny) and the processor in a modern laptop. Why this giant thing? note - a not yet produced graphical model is what you see most on Google, the ones produced thus far are ugly boxes. . . . . . . . . . .9/11, 4/11, 3/11? see a pattern? Let's not see a 6/11. Your time and effort in spreading the word may really make a difference. Due to the many positive e-mails about getting the truth out, rather than hold back I am going to put the original information back. It follows below.
The quake was not what we were told.
In fact, the quake was a bold faced lie, packing a political agenda. There is even more proof now, and it goes beyond the linked Japanese chart. This original seismic data is the smoking gun, however, I have something better. I finally suppressed the urge to vomit and analyzed the lies told by the USGS, and from them wrote this sad, sad story about how it really was, not what you will see in the video. Keep in mind that precise top speeds of flying debris cannot be determined with accuracy, but this story will at least be close to the numbers put out by the USGS. The people in the newsroom did not die, this story is what would have happened if the USGS charts were true. Meet Atsuo, Airi, and Akiyoshi. They were all the best and most dedicated people at the NHK newsroom, in Sendai Japan. Akiyoshi loved Airi, and Atsuo was the one who introduced them. Unfortunately, all 3 died in the quake. Akiyoshi got a severe cut and bled to death when he hit a display screen behind him at 44 miles an hour, and was then thrown out through a hole in a collapsed wall. Airi followed pretty much the same path, and died beside him in the rubble. Atsuo flew through the open door behind him, then crashed through a window and was crushed when he landed in a massive seismic crack in the road, which closed in on him. Others in the newsroom died also, but I never thought up names for them. At least, according to the official USGS charts. The laser printer was never found, but the table it was on ended up on top of the rubble, smashed to pieces, where one of the few survivors used a piece of the metal frame to splint his broken leg. The video below is the one I pulled the frames out of for the sad, sad story. It is a video of a newsroom at the hardest hit area in Japan, and it SAYS IT ALL. This is when the quake was happening live. They are alarmed there is an earthquake, but most people stay seated in their chairs.
Some people even keep typing on their computers as the quake happens.
Also, note that most of the stuff stays on the desks, at the end, a laser printer is still sitting on a cheap table, ect. some things fall but things return to normal quickly, all the while the English announcer is reading a script of devastation with all the pep of some paid fool who does not believe what he is saying in a cheezy infomercial. The quake was significant, but only in a 6.0 sense, as recorded by the seismographs. This is important footage, because it proves the earthquake measured at a 6.8 was an instrumentation based richter reading. Confusion between the Shindo and Richter scale is being used to cover this up . I chose this video because it's location is documented to have been the worst affected, and was recorded in a news room with a known fixed location. This video gets deleted off youtube occasionally, if it does not work check back later and I might have re-linked it.
Remember that this video is proof of what really went on. This means there never were significant aftershocks, never was a natural tsunami, and if they lied about that, what else? This video is pivotal and vital to exposing the truth. Sure there was a quake, but at this newsroom it was not much over a six if it even was a six. I chose this video because the news room is within eyeshot of station MYG012, which was used by the USGS to make these graphs which represent an 8.8, as was stated in this (English) newscast and was probably used as a guide to fudge the lie due to the closeness of the newsroom to the seismic station. Looking at these charts, it is super easy to get a rough guess at how fast people would have flown. 44MPH to the North, and 28MPH to the East. Those are not precise numbers but the charts are proven wrong by the video because according to the charts people should have entered uncontrolled flight. Here is the full chart put out by the USGS Of course, they offer no reading from MYG011, which was closest to the 9.0 "epicenter" by a long shot, because it only got a 5.63's worth of shaking. I will do that work for them. That map is below. I challenge ANYONE to send me pictures of this quake showing me devastation in an area not hit by the tsunami. All we have, all the pictures are tsunami damage. Let's see pictures of quake damage. The Kobe quake was a 6.9/7.2 depending on source. That makes this quake, at a 9.0 100X as powerful. Sendai was near the epicenter and would have been devastated if it really happened. Look at the earthquake photos of damage from the Kobe quake, and try to find ONE THING SIMILAR in SENDAI. Just try. They do not exist. Outside of the tsunami, the quake which supposedly hit Sendai with many times the power of the one in Kobe, did not destroy a single building there. Sendai was only 48 miles from the epicenter of this "9.0" which would have devastated everything in an area 1,000 miles across if it was real. All of Japan would be toast. Try to find a photo of seismic damage in Sendai. I challenge you. Try to find it in any of the coastal cities, as little as 25 miles from the "epicenter". I looked for 5 hours, and except for some tanks that fell at a brewery not a single one exists. No pictures of collapsed skyscrapers or high rises equals NO 9.0. You will not find a single skyscraper photo where the windows got broken either. You will find no downed power poles, no flipped over cars, no uprooted trees, no derailed trains (except for one the tsunami hit), and the road damage is typical of even a 5.0. You will not find pictures of a single damaged multi story building or even a structurally damaged wood framed house outside the tsunami zone. In Sendai the quake messed up grocery stores and kitchens and that really is about it.
And now, I will say it like I knew it had to be.
I believe the phony 9.0 story was used as seismic cover for a tsunami nuke, which produced the tsunami of a 9.0 when detonated in the Japan trench (where no earthquakes of significance happen) as punishment for Japan offering to enrich uranium for Iran. The rest of the story, the concealment, is black ops. Bet on it. In the tsunami videos, the tsunami rips through pristine and undamaged cities, where business as usual is obvious and the tsunami is an ambush; not 9.0 earthquake ravaged debris. The quake is a paper thin story taped together by the undeserved trust of a gullible public. And the stories? The CIA did not hire a million people last year for nothing. If there is evidence of a 9.0 SHOW ME. A 9.0 will devastate an area over 1,000 miles across. That is how big a 9.0 is. The entire nation should be in ruins, especially judging from the damage the 6.9 Kobe quake did, and no where, no where outside the tsunami zone in the entire country is there a single damaged multi story building, a single collapsed bridge, a single structurally damaged wood framed house, or skyscraper. If a picture exists that can be definitively pinned to this quake, show me. The only collapsed structure in all of Japan was an old welfare shelter near station MYG004, the true epicenter. Take a look at these frame captures, and ask a question - Why is no one trying to run? Why are the cars all just parked peacefully as the tsunami arrived? Why was there no warning? Why did the tsunami sirens only go off after the tsunami arrived? Could it be that the people and the governement had not felt a significant earthquake and did not measure one either?
Question: Why are none of the roads packed with people trying to flee the approaching tsunami?
Could it be that the people and government were not expecting one? Tsunami sirens blare only when it arrives, rather than 40 minutes before, which is how much warning they would have had if a real quake in the ocean had been detected. Consider that. Parking lots full of cars, everyone at work, no one trying to leave. AMBUSH!!. When people keep typing at their keyboards during the quake, it's obviously not what we were told.
RUSH UPDATE, May 28
When reviewing the seismic data for the supposed 9.0, I knew there were instead 3 small simultaneous inland epicenters. This made me suspicious right from the start that the quake was artificially triggered and used as seismic cover for a tsunami bomb. But I needed a reason to believe an artificial quake could have been done. I suspected that either Japan was testing nukes and Israeli intelligence was onto it and used the tests as the "start of clock" for their operation, or Israel managed to smuggle nukes into lava tubes and tunnels far underground to trigger earthquakes and contain the blasts. So I was hunting for tunnels and lava tubes near each of the three epicenters, and wanted to find them before writing this into this report. As it turns out, I did not need to. This military briefing with Secretary of Defense William Cohen, dated all the way back to 1997! shows that even then, Cohen knew about EM weaponry that could trigger quakes and set off volcanoes. I have ignored everything regarding this subject, I thought it was the realm of kooks. I thought EM weaponry would be effective in weather modification only, but I am not going to argue with the Secretary of Defense. There are obviously then, energy technologies which have never been publicized, such weaponry would need far more energy input than the electrical grid could provide. And the systems Cohen spoke of in 1997 would be outdated now. Cohen stated: "Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves. So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It's real, and that's the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that's why this is so important. - William S. Cohen, Secretary of Defense, April 28, 1997. Left unsaid by William Cohen is that such systems would be developed by DARPA and owned by America first! I would expect with 14 years of advancement that these technologies could now trigger devastating earthquakes in non-seismic zones.
The following picture is the strongest reading for this quake on any seismogram anywhere in Japan. This was before the lie machine got running smoothly. Early on there were a few sputters and this REAL chart got out. As you can see on this chart, it was a 6.67 on the Richter scale, (not shindo scale, confirmed by PGA reference) This would fit in with NO structural damage in Sendai and the level of shaking in the video
This quake was initially asessed a 6.8, and the seismic data will show anyone the epicenter was inland, not at sea. So it started a 6.8, then got upgraded to a 7.9, then got upgraded to an 8.4, then got upgraded to an 8.8, then got upgraded to a 9.0, and had the epicenter put out in the ocean. Now many are saying it was a 9.1 which would bump up MYG011's number to 1200 from 1070, and it is all based on tsunami effects, not seismic data.
The following seismograms clearly show epicenters from 3 separate small quakes all occuring simultaneously. This is what would be expected of an attack, rather than a natural occurence.
One problem with people grasping how big a 9.0 is, is exponential charts which will hide how much energy is really being released behind confusing gradient marking. To answer the need for clarity, I got out the calculator andproduced a chart that shows you how big a 9.0 earthquake is on a linear scale. Make sure you expand and scroll it, it is 5,000 pixels tall. Due to its large verticle height it opens on the left side of the screen and is almost invisible until you expand it. Confusion over how GIANT a 9.0 really is has helped the elite scammers enormously in their lie. There is simply no way much of anything will remain standing, yet as the tsunami rolls in . . . . . .
And now, I will bite. This is what I did not want to publish, but I know it has to be true. Call this creative journalism, because I never called Netanyahu, but here is the most rational conclusion I can draw, based on all info gathered so far including the original not faked seismic data.
I honestly believe Japan is being held a nuclear hostage. It all makes sense.
1. Japan offers to enrich uranium for Israel's GREAT SATAN, Iran
2. Immediately, Israel sets up front companies masquerading as security companies, and one of them succeeds in getting a security contract at a Japanese nuclear facility. 4 months later the Dimona Dozen shows up, and under the cover of a security contract gets unlimited access to the heart of Fukushima. They plant the virus, install real cameras outside the facility, and functional poorly disguised nuke cameras inside the facility. In addition to this, they install an unauthorized data connection to allow control of all the guts of the facility via the virus. (they admitted to this connection, as discussed later on this page)
3. After installing Stuxnet and the nukes they scram
4. Israel waits for one of the many natural quakes in Japan to provide cover for a tsunami bomb, and they already have it at the bottom of the Japan trench. VLF communications are established with the bomb to penetrate the water. David in Dimona gets seismic reading from Japan. 6.67 in progress, BOOM. (new evidence shows the quake most likely was not natural)
Tsunami comes in, swamps stuxnet infected power plant, direct video feed from legitimate cameras security company installed gets to David via totally unauthorized channel, and David knows just when to cut the generators off. Others on the team do all they can to counteract measures taken by the employees at fukushima, who are unaware an attack is taking place and do not understand why everything is going crazy
5. Israeli Prime Minister calls Japan, and says TAKE THAT for offering help to Iran, and ya know, there are FIVE MORE NUKES in the ocean off the coast of Japan, and we are going to set those off and destroy your coastal cities if you do not forget that 6.67, and say it was a 9 to cover for tsunami effects. AND NOW we are going to make your people DEMAND you move away from nuclear power so you can NEVER threaten us like that again. We are BLOWING UP FUKUSHIMA DIIACHI and you are going to go along with whatever story we tell you to. SO THERE!!
6. David and his pals close ALL valves to the reactors via the remote data link they admitted to installing, and put them full throttle, to melt them down while the virus keeps control room readouts displaying false info, like nothing is going on even though the place is coming apart. After enough mayhem ensues to provide plausibility, they set off planted nukes and blow the place sky high.
And even if the quake was real, there are nukes that can reach an 8.4. Close enough. Though I have yet to work out the final details, I probably have enough to hang them because:
1. I got the real seismic data that proves beyond a doubt the quake is not what we were told and was in fact an inland 6.8, (calculated higher than the seismogram due to the triangulated true epicenter being a little higher) which would get noticed but not feared in quake ridden Japan.
2. Numerous referenced sources prove Stuxnet really was written by Israel
3. Japan really did offer to enrich Uranium for Iran, and Israel has been documented to have attempted to destroy the reactor in Iran, and probably did. Japan contributing to Iran's nuclear future would make them just as much an enemy to Israel as Iran. Israel would want them taken out.
4. It is documented that a team from Israel, with a history consisting only of working in Israeli defense, got unlimited access to a Japanese nuclear facility, which then went boom
5. Reactor 4 had been defueled and proven disassembled, and therefore no explosion there was possible. What should have happened at reactor 4, if anything at all? the fuel pools should have melted down and caught fire once the water boiled off from lack of recirculation AT Worst, and badly contaminated the containment structure, NOTHING ELSE. NO explosions, NOTHING ELSE. Reactor 4 is building 7, PERIOD. Why did an explosion there happen that was so severe it blew the outer containment walls (4 feet thick) and inner containment walls that were much thicker? Reactor 4 is reportedly now in danger of falling over. HOW?
6. The Japanese government is going along with the story of a scientifically proven false 9.0. There is a reason, and my guess is that Israel has made threats to wipe out Japanese coastal cities with additional tsunamis if the government of Japan speaks a word of what went on, there should be no reason for Japan to go along with this other than a continued threat.
Is it not interesting this "quake" reportedly happened at the bottom of the Japan trench, which would be perfect for hiding an atomic bomb blast?
Is the Department of Homeland Security trying to keep American industries (and nuclear facilities) in the dark about Stuxnet? After Fukushima fell victim to unwary operators, I would think such a conference would be a TOP priority here! The genie is out of the bottle. It is a fact that the writers of Stuxnet intend to use it. So cancelling a well researched conference about the vulnerabilities of the Siemens SCADA system to Stuxnet in the name of "keeping hackers from getting info" seems to me like an effort to keep the threat alive. Ignore the fluff at the beginning, and read the "About TakeDownCon" summary near the bottom so you know what they actually cancelled rather than settle for the no-panic fluff at the beginning. This is SERIOUS. I fear that by the time the Hacker Halted conference happens in October, the summer of disaster may have passed. And if it has not, I bet any discussion of Stuxnet at Hacker Halted will also be cancelled. Stuxnet is too good a toy for a very powerful group to let go of. Something is fishy here.
Other publications picked up this story now, and are poo pooing the issue into the ground. They are obviously attempting to morph responsibility for Stuxnet style attacks away from Israel so that they can regain cover and use the weapon as a false flag tool to destroy internet freedom. This is where they are going to go with this - count on it, and when the disasters happen there will be a cozy blanket of lies shielding Israel from all blame. Never forget, THIS IS THEIR BABY, NEVER FORGET. Prior to them doing this, WE NEVER HEARD OF IT.
About "prompt criticality" - As it turns out, Arnie Gundersen, mister "prompt criticality" with regard to the massive explosion at #3 is very poorly credentialed. His crowning achievement was playing with a 100 watt open water tank reactor in a classroom for a short period of time.
Fuel rods are only 20 percent fissionable, sometimes even less, and until you reach over 90 percent purity in U238 and about 70 percent purity in Plutonium NO "prompt criticality" is possible in ANY case no matter how much of it you have laying around. Furthermore, even with 100 percent pure material you need a precision trigger slamming or crushing material together to get a detonation. Even if 100 percent pure material is slammed together at high speed, if it is not done right you will get only a nuclear "sputter" that pushes the pieces apart, and no detonation. Nukes are hard to do! Why have so many of us seemed to have forgotten that nuclear detonations are hard to accomplish? The "prompt criticality" in spent fuel story is something I would have expected to hear from an Ewok praying to a gold robot. I can't believe even a scammer would have the guts to suggest it, let alone allow it to be spread around in his name. For an explanation for the explosions, just look at the cameras the Dimona Dozen brought in. If someone is waving a degree as an anchor for this "prompt criticality" bull hockey, remember that there is such a thing as a paper trained idiot and if you look into Gundersen's background you will discover he is barely that, with his ONLY hands on experience outside a classroom being an intern at a nuclear facility two years before he got his degree!
If the mainstream media wanted the facts, why did they pick this guy? Because he said what they wanted, truth be damned.
"We at Vermont Yankee are well acquainted with Arnie and his exaggerations. He plays to a public and a legislature that has zero knowledge of nuclear power or engineering and is willing to accept any negative claim as truth." And since he gave an impossible "prompt criticality" explanation which diverted attention away from the only real explanation for the magnitude of the explosion at #3 - a nuke, they gave him a ton of air. Enough said.
This post has been greatly improved via input from readers. If you have information proving any points wrong, or think something should be clarified, as well as new info that can further solidify the case, contact me. Thanks!
If you read this far, I invite you to take part in the Truth Project
The article about Fukushima follows.
_______________________________________
Fukushima was impossible. The swamping of the external generators by the tsunami was irrelevant, because the real emergency backup systems are driven by steam from the reactors themselves. No electricity is needed to operate three separate emergency systems at each reactor, each of which will keep a reactor safe even if only one works. Interesting it is then that all 9 non electrical backup systems across the three fueled reactors failed. This is technically impossible outside of willful intent, and was likely the result of a Stuxnet attack.
Stuxnet was designed specifically to target Siemens SCADA controllers and is most effective at tampering with fluid control systems. The centrifuges it attacked in Iran were ideal. So are the fluid control systems at a nuclear facility. Oil refineries are equally at risk, Stuxnet is most dangerous when affecting a system which needs to control the flow of any liquid, be it hydraulic, for cooling, or combining chemicals. Stuxnet is documented to have been produced by theIsraeli Defense Forces, for the purpose of destroying any industrial system that can be destroyed by improper fluid flow.
Magna BSP, a Dimona based company with no history outside of IDF contracts prior to Fukushima has asuspiciously short domain history despite a 10 year claimed history.Magna BSP had a full time internet linked two way connection to the Fukushima reactor room(s) all the way through the disaster. They told TEPCO about that connection on March 15 (after everything blew sky high) via an article printed in the Jerusalem Post. Why did Manga BSP wait until everything was blown sky high to tell Tepco the data link existed, and then did not tell them face to face? I find it hard to believe that TEPCO would not have been interested in viewing a reactor that was about to explode. It seems impossible that Tepco would not have wanted to view the reactor, and probably did not ask because the link was kept a secret. It is a simple fact that internet connections are never allowed inside a reactor's containment. The connection was mentioned in the Jerusalem Post AFTER the destruction was finalized.
Stuxnet has two modes, random and administrative. It can be administered to optimize the damage and can also transmit setup information and industrial system information to a remote computer. Once installed on the host system via a flash drive it causes that system to violate it's normal security protocols and internet administration becomes possible if a connection exists. Tampering is not visible on the control room readouts, because Stuxnet learns what "normal" looks like and keeps the temperature, pressure, and other readouts within normal limits so that the operators are oblivious to the destruction happening in secret. Stuxnet appeared in Japan in June of 2010, shortly after Magna BSP arrived. Remote administration mode can be adjusted on demand to suit any need. No doubt the people at Fukushima sat there in idle mode thinking all was well until something screamed or went boom and at that point it would be too late to do anything other than cry.
I am a lifer in the types of control systems Fukushima and it's clone, TVA owned Browns Ferry have. BOTH have been upgraded to modern Siemens controllers running the Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) system Stuxnet was designed to attack; upgrades are the norm in any major facility. On many blogs people say the controls were old and therefore Stuxnet immune; they are out of touch or have no knowledge of industrial control systems. I actually ferreted it out.
And now I will explain in detail why the problems before the explosions had to be sabotage
The diesel generators were not out in the open as we were led to believe, they were in fact located in the basements of the turbine buildings which were sealed off and never significantly flooded. One of them stayed running the entire time, but the electrical switch gear attached to it disconnected it for an unexplained reason which made it useless. Each of the backup generators at Fukushima were capable of running 14,000 households each, which means they had to be over ten megawatts each. It is obvious then that Fukushima was set up to survive on only ONE of 13 backup generators, and ONE did keep running. One would be many times larger than needed to run last ditch backup systems at all reactors, but would not keep business as usual. But that is not the real story, which is that even others which were high and dry stopped as well.
I hypothesize that the ONE generator that kept running was kept as a lone reserve, never hooked up to a SCADA controller. Why did the switch gear disconnect a working generator? That is the type of thing Stuxnet was designed to do. On top of these things, emergency generators arrived on scene within 9 hours, before anything bad happened at all but were not able to provide power because the switch gear would not let them. This deceptively written report from the World Nuclear Association contains all this information, but it is presented in a way which will cause you to overlook these things if you are not careful while reading it. This report contains accurate information presented in a very misleading way, which will protect the liars who wrote it - they actually did speak the truth here but in a way it would be missed by virtually anyone. Study the facts presented here with the full ramifications of those facts in mind, not their shallow misleading conclusions.
From this report you can get:
1. The generators never got submerged - you have to connect the dot between them being in a contained area and the tsunami thereby not being able to get to them. Some water got into one of the the turbine buildings where several were located and flooded the lowest point in that building to a depth of 4 feet, which means that even if the generators were on the floor at the lowest point they likely would not have been swamped because they are too big - the water would not get past the footings. Perhaps a one megawatt generator would have swamped; certainly not one of the big diesels, which were, according to this report enough to run 14,000 homes each. In addition to this, there were several generators in a second location that never got flooded at all. One of these generators kept running but was not able to get power into the facility because the switchgear prevented it.
2. You have to have watched the robot videos, which clearly show the switch gear that malfunctioned after the tsunami never got wet - there was a non tsunami reason for the failure. Also look at the high resolution photos referenced below. There is no switch gear for the diesel generators outside the facility, it is all indoors in areas higher than the water got. Remember that there was no emergency when the off site generators arrived, which means that they could work efficiently to get things up and running. With my experience in this area, Assuming it DID get soaked, a complete replacement of high capacity switch gear should only take an afternoon if done with an emergency attitude. A truck mounted crane or a forklift does all the heavy lifting and the stuff is modular. In every major facility there are spares galore. It is not that hard to make the terminations. A worst case scenario could have been addressed before things went horribly awry, that is, unless a virus did not let the new switch gear activate either. It would take days to conclude a virus was messing things up. You would not expect that. I am sure there is a LOT we never heard about.
3. That batteries held, leaving only a one hour gap in time where there was no power present to run things before adequate off site power drove into the facility on the road all nice and ready to hook up, but was denied to by switch gear which this report says was swamped but that is likely an assumption because swamped switchgear could have been replaced even before the batteries died. The fact that the offsite generators were able to be driven into the facility also proves that other lies told about the earthquake in general - employees leaving only to find cracks in the road so bad they had to walk home; Why? Why lie like this? AT LEAST this report has some modicum of honesty.
4. You have to look at the chart that shows the thermal output of the reactors 8 hours after the earthquake, which is when the batteries running the electrical cooling pumps died, the output at that time was less than 20 megawatts from each reactor, which means that they would not have had troubles before the off site generators were hooked up to restore power if it was not denied by what I suspect was stuxnet infected switch gear. The real critical time is in the first 3 hours after shutdown.
5. Reactor 3 exploded entirely, yet this reactor had the most functional backup systems. At least this report says the explosion remains "unexplained". Perhaps those who wrote the report should take a look at this for an answer.
6. The reactors are stated to be an "early 1960's design" apparently to mislead people into believing they were outdated even when installed. This was not the case. Their design was an early 60's concept but in fact a late 60's design, and since installation takes years, what more could you expect in the early 70's? The reactors were in fact a very safe design. This report at least states that the facility was very well updated. Identical reactors at TVA owned browns ferry have been certified safe and licensed to operate through the year 2035. These reactors were also converted over to run the Siemens Scada system. The reactors at Fukushima were not garbage. The fastest cars in production still function on a late 1800's concept.
I hypothesize that the situation at Fukushima is not being properly assessed by facility controllers because STUXNET is STILL giving false readings to the control panels, readings which obviously have to be false because they show containment pressure when confidental leaked photographs prove beyond a doubt no containment exists AT ALL at reactor 3. There is not even a reactor there.
This report is perfectly inaccurate with regard to reactor 3 containment. Perhaps the people who wrote this report have not actually looked at the facility or seen the confidential photographs.
This report supports what I have said here entirely. It was written by an experienced reactor operator. I found this on May 10. I was absolutely right!
Each reactor has 8 separate emergency backup systems, each capable of saving the reactor on it's own. Three are designed to function perfectly if all power is lost and even the generators fail. Fukushima did not need any electrical systems operating AT ALL to keep itself from blowing up, when power is lost steam from the reactors is automatically diverted from the generator turbines to two totally separate steam turbines connected to totally separate water pumps needing only reactor steam to power them. Even that backup system has dual redundancy, only one of the two is needed for the job. But the valves which have to activate to re-divert the steam, all 6 valves on a total of 3 fueled reactors, eventually failed to. At reactors 1 and 3 these systems worked, but switched off at reactor 1 within an hour and off at reactor 3 after running for more than two days. No one has been able to explain why these systems switched off all by themselves, when they need a powered command to switch off. At reactor 2 they were never allowed to activate. This can only happen if the control system tells them to shut off or stay off, absent intervention from the controller they automatically and seamlessly switch cooling modes to passive rather than electrical.
Some readers may remember that the real issue at Fukushima was malfunctioning valves, and the need to get someone past the radiation to open them. These are the valves that were spoken of. Because Stuxnet kept the readouts normal, no one knew this system did not function until major problems happened as a result flooding the area where the valves are with radiation. This prevented last ditch efforts (running and cutting the wires). One automatic valve jamming and mechanically failing would be a surprise,6 failing can only be sabotage.
In addition to this, another completely independent separately piped backup with an entirely different electronic decision tree which injects borated water at a pre charged 3,500 PSI into the reactor to irrevocably shut down all chain reactions (reactor rebuild required) also simultaneously failed at all 3 fueled reactors. The borated water systems have explosive operated valves so reliable that even one out of 3 failing would be a ten thousand to one possiblity, if that. The reliability of the borated water systems is technically theoretically assured. All three failing at the same time at Fukushima can only mean sabotage.
High pressure in all of the reactors proves the quake did not damage any of the infrastructure at fukushima because any leaks would have let the pressure go. In addition to this, the seismic readings at Fukushima were 6.07 Fukushima was designed to handle being at the epicenter of an 8.
The media keeps harping about how all the water went away. It only did because these three backup systems were prevented from cooling the reactor which caused the water to boil off and never be replaced. High pressures were talked about constantly in the press; This means beyond a doubt that all 6 steam powered backup systems were intact, and all 3 borated water systems were intact also because if they were not the pressure would have escaped through them. Absent emergency backup control power keeping the virus alive; (control power Magna BSP admitted was there the whole time by mistake when they said their cameras and supporting computers captured the explosions and maintained a data link) the valves which control these systems would have opened when the generators failed and there would have been no disaster. 3 worst case scenarios where all 9 automatic valves across 9 separate emergency backup systems are held shut by the controller when no power should have been present to prevent them from activating can only mean sabotage.
A historical perspective of Fukushima shows the hydrogen blasts were bogus.
Hydrogen blasts could not have damaged Fukushima so badly, this is a media fed lie. If hydrogen gas alone mixed with air could produce blasts strong enough to blow reactor containment buildings to pieces, which are among the strongest structures on earth (exceeded in strength only by ones like Hoover Dam,) then hydrogen gas filled bombs would be the prime military option. In reality, the Three Mile Island incident proved hydrogen ignition in open air after reactor meltdown is likely to only scare employees, while causing no damage at all to the facility, as was the case there. It is extremely important to know the differences between the boiling water reactor design and the design of Chernobyl. At Chernobyl, a hydrogen blast DID cause destruction of the facility, but it was because the reactor design caused hydrogen and oxygen at a perfect ratio to ignite at thousands of PSI inside the reactor pressure vessel. That's a big difference from hydrogen alone igniting in relatively oxygen starved open air at one atmosphere (14.5 PSI). The difference would be similar to the difference between a small firecracker and a case of dynamite; there were many orders of magnitude lower blast potential at Fukushima.
Just to be absolutely safe after the Three Mile Island incident, many nuclear facilities installed hydrogen hard vent stacks hooked directly up to the relief valves on their reactors, and Fukushima was one of them. This was to prevent a hydrogen buildup in the containment building in the event of a core meltdown, which caused a minor explosion at Three Mile Island. These stacks are the tall white towers you see in the photographs of Fukushima, and they are effective in getting rid of hydrogen buildup, are directly piped, and vent completely outside. "Hard piped" means that the electrical failures would have had nothing to do with the blasts, because a hard vent is exactly that - no fan needed at all because the system is sealed. Even if the hard piping at all 3 fueled Fukushima reactors failed entirely, it should not have been any worse than Three Mile Island which did not have any hard venting to begin with. While hydrogen venting might be a problem if it ignited, it would not mean the death of a facility. It makes no sense that at Fukushima we got a nuclear weapon style mushroom cloud far in excess of the highest yield conventional bomb.
Below are the classified photos
What then, caused the explosions? The containment walls were at their thinnest points in the lowest allowed General Electric design a minimum of 4 foot thick steel reinforced concrete, were likely to be a minimum of 8 feet thick, and were totally blown away. All concrete was stripped from the rebar, which was left dangling. Reactor 3 vanished entirely,as seen in the classified photo used to compare the destruction to the diagram and reactor 4 appears to have been blown to pieces as seen in this classified photo The yellow dome which should be sitting on top of reactor 4 can be clearly seen on the wrong side of the containment building. This type of destruction is is indicative of hard weaponry in use; a hydrogen air mix will not do that. Reactors are not made out of tinfoil. On top of this, there was no potential for an explosion at reactor 4 at all, it had been defueled. SO WHAT, PRAY TELL, BLEW IT APART? That's the dirty question no one is asking - how did that happen?
To give you an idea of how big the reactors at Fukushima were, look at this. It's the top of the same make and model at Fukushima's American twin, TVA owned Brown's Ferry, and it is only the top. The yellow dome sits above this, and is even bigger. (here the yellow dome has been removed for refueling). over 150 feet of reactor sits below that cap. Hydrogen will not vaporize that, which appears to be what happened to #3, only a nuclear weapon would. Reactors are about 14 digits beyond incapable of going supercritical even with a complete core meltdown. The reactors did not explode, something placed in their vicinity did.
Magna BSP had access to the reactors at this facility. They were based in Dimona, which is a military base that manufactures nuclear weapons. Stuxnet was made in their yard. They are stated to be a military company.
There is extremely strong evidence that Dimona based Magna BSP placed nuclear weapons at the exploded or vanished reactors at Fukushima, possibly hidden inside one of their unbelievably GIANT stereoscopic cameras. These cameras were installed inside the reactor containment of Fukushima reactor 3 under the cover of a security contract in the year prior to the disaster. These cameras are identical in size and appearance to a gun type nuclear weapon. Since previous hydrogen explosions at boiling water reactors have never caused any sort of damage to equipment or buildings, even during complete meltdowns, it begs the question how on earth one at reactor 3 produced a mushroom cloud. Three Mile Island sits in the evidence pool against what we have been told about Fukushima. History does matter.
One problem with the reporting in the mainstream media is that it failed to convey just how massive and strong the containment structures really were, as seen in this classified photo. A hydrogen explosion would only blow the sheet metal off the steel framed roof if it even did that, at Three Mile Island the hydrogen ignition did nothing at all. It just scared employees. Another thing the reporting failed to convey is the gravity of the disaster. Compare thecontainment diagram to the remains of reactor 3. It is painfully obvious that many tons of highly radioactive plutonium in the containment pools is nowhere to be found, the entire floor they were on is completly gone. We are getting lied to.
That was a LOT more than a hydrogen blast, and as a result there are thousands of pounds of plutonium scattered everywhere. TEPCO was ridiculed for initially stating that the radiation from the facility was "immeasurable". I think they at first told the truth. Now they have this story about the Fukushima 50. Is it in fact a "wag the dog"? No one could be there and live. Why is remote controlled heavy equipment doing the cleanup? The official story is hydrogen blasts, not nukes, so the story line has to at least be within the far outer limits of what a hydrogen blast could actually accomplish; not missing reactors and entire fuel pools blown away.
I suggest you ponder the pictures and materials presented and reach your own conclusion. A government issued training manual for the reactors at Fukushima is here
Now that Osama, who has been dead for 10 years is officially dead, Al Quaida is going to use a nuke, so they say; I strongly urge you to consider this article if a nuke actually does go off somewhere or if other nuclear facilities start acting like Fukushima.
The only reason I believe the management at Fukushima is not telling it like it really was is because victim status has been so well asserted by the ethnic group in question that it is career suicide to point the finger at them, even when they try to kill you. I find it interesting that all 12 Non Japanese employees of Magna BSP returned to Israel a week before the tsunami . . . . .
I might have understood the need for Stuxnet if it's use would have ended with Iran. Unfortunately that does not appear to be the case. I do hope this article breaks their toy.
For those of you who are reluctant to re-post this because the wording is too strong, I ask you to consider this;
The real answer came out of Fukushima. We have a member of the international community which has already done horrendous damage to a very advanced and (presently) innocent civilization and we simply cannot continue to tolerate it. Consider what ignoring this will cost you. Are you prepared to have a major disaster at the convenience of the couch; because you sat there watching TV rather than dragging your butt over to the computer to at least spread the word? Are your video games, ball games, 4x4 and porno really worth continuing to lose everything for? Is your religion going to keep you silent as well? We really need a serious wake up call. Please let this post be it, rather than some other unforseen disaster.
Thank you to the many readers who pointed out flaws, gave tips, and suggested clarifications, you studied this indeed! My thanks also goes out to the radio hosts who have had me on the air and invited me to appear to discuss this subject. BTW, this article was written via code entry, without spell check. Consider that.
These references included as e-mail compatible links.
A leading Japanese journalist recently made two incredible claims about the Fukushima power plant that suffered a nuclear meltdown in March 2011, sending shockwaves around the world. First, the former editor of a national newspaper in Japan says the U.S. and Israel knew Fukushima had weapons-grade uranium and plutonium that were exposed to the atmosphere after a massive tsunami wave hit the reactor. Second, he contends that Israeli intelligence sabotaged the reactor in retaliation for Japan’s support of an independent Palestinian state.
According to Yoishi Shimatsu, a former editor of Japan Times Weekly, these nuclear materials were shipped to the plant in 2007 on the orders of Dick Cheney and George W. Bush, with the connivance of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. The shipment was in the form of warhead cores secretly removed from the U.S. nuclear warheads facility BWXT Plantex near Amarillo, Texas. While acting as the middleman, Israel transported warheads from the port of Houston, and in the process kept the best ones while giving the Japanese older warhead cores that had to be further enriched at Fukushima.
Shimatsu credits retired CIA agent and mercenary Roland Vincent Carnaby with learning the warheads were being transported from Houston. In a strange twist, Carnaby was mysteriously shot dead less than a year later by Houston police at a traffic stop. He was shot once in the back and once in the chest. He did not have a weapon in his hands. Intelligence sources said he had been tracking a Mossad unit that was smuggling U.S. plutonium out of Houston docks for an Israeli nuclear reactor.
In an even more explosive charge, the journalist says that 20 minutes before the Fukushima plant’s nuclear meltdown, Israel was so upset with Japanese support for a Palestinian declaration of statehood that it double-crossed Japan by unleashing the Stuxnet virus on the plant’s computers. The virus hampered the shutdown, leading to fallout from a section of the plant housing uranium and plutonium retrieved from the warheads supplied in 2007.
While it is impossible to verify some of Shimatsu’s claims, there was a massive cover-up at the time of the Fukushima disaster in March. Explosions at the site were immediately downplayed. While it was subsequently reported that three reactors suffered meltdowns, Japanese authorities tried to rate the disaster as a Level 4 on the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale, although outside experts declared it a 7, which is the highest level.
Something worth noting is how in 2009, two years after Shimatsu says the warheads were secretly moved to Japan, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) issued a veiled warning to Japan not to abandon its anti-nuclear weapons policy.
The IAEA had to know, however, that Japan has long retained the potential to build nuclear weapons. That was made clear as far back as 1996 when a leaked Ministry of Foreign Affairs document exposed how Japan had been promoting a dual strategy in respect to nuclear weapons since the mid-1960s. It would often publicly profess a non-nuclear policy while maintaining the ability to build a nuclear arsenal. The Liberal Democratic Party, which has dominated Japanese politics, has always said there is no constitutional impediment to nukes.
A factor that undoubtedly would have encouraged the Bush-Cheney White House to provide Japan with the means to secretly build nukes was the growing power of China. Cheney and Bush sought to arm Japan and India with nuclear weapons as a means of curbing China.
この水準なら、仙台の建物に構造的被害が無いことも、揺れがあの程度なこともうなずけます。
