My Blog List

Sunday, November 13, 2011

The Current State of Archaeology in Palestine


Jesus Christ at His Sermon on the Mount where He taught the world what charity and truth are.


Original site in title link above and full page reproduction in this link here: The First Amendment: The Current State of Archaeology in Palestine

One part of genocide is always the destruction of a people's culture. This is a major part of the Zionist unlawful assault upon the Palestinians, the genocide against the Palestinians which is called al-Naqba.



Palestine at the birth of Christ



Bethlehem, prosperous Palestinian city under Muslim rule with full rights for Christians and complete harmony between Palestinian Christians and Muslims, before the Zionist genocide upon the Palestinians, al-Naqba.




الحالة الراهنة للاثار في فلسطين
حمدان طه
مدير دائرة فلسطين للآثار والتراث الثقافي

تأسست دائرة الاثار والتراث الثقافي قبل خمس عشرة سنة، منذ تاريخ اعادة تأسيسها سنة 1994. وقد مثل انشاء هذه الادارة حدثا مهما، يمكن اعتباره اعادة بعث لدائرة الاثار الفلسطينية التي تأسست عام 1920 في عهد الانتداب البريطاني، والتي توقفت عن الوجود مع أحداث سنة 1948، حين اقيمت اسرائيل على الاراضي الفلسطينية واتبعت الضفة الغربية الى الاردن وغزة الى مصر. يقدم هذا العرض خلفية تاريخية حول اثار فلسطين، تشمل رؤيتها ومنطلقاتها وأهدافها وتطورها ونشاطاتها في فترة التكوين هذه. كما تقدم سجلا بالنشاط الاثري الميداني والمشاريع التي قامت بها في الاراضي الفلسطينية، بما في ذلك التنقيبات المشتركة ومشاريع الترميم وحالة الحفاظ على المواقع الاثرية. ان هذا التقرير هو تحديث لنسخة سابقة بعنوان (عقد من العمل الاثري في فلسطين)، نشر في العام 2005.


The Current State of Archaeology in Palestine


HAMDAN TAHA


Director, Palestinian Department of Antiquities and Cultural Heritage


The Palestinian Department of Antiquities and Cultural Heritage (DACH) has been in existence now for more than fifteen years since its re-establishment in 1994. The inauguration of this Department was a momentous event. It may be considered the revival of the Department of Antiquities of Palestine, which was established in 1920 under the British Mandate. The authority was then terminated due to the political events of 1948 when Israel was established, while Jordan assumed those responsibilities for the West Bank and Egypt for the Gaza strip. This report provides a historical background on the archaeology of Palestine, an overview of its vision, inception, objectives, development and activities during this formative period. It gives an account of the archaeological field work, current projects carried out in the Palestinian areas, including the joint excavations, restoration projects and the state of preservation of archaeological and cultural heritage sites. This is an updated version of the article (A Decade of Archaeology in Palestine) published in 2005.



Introduction

The Palestinian Department of Antiquities and Cultural Heritage (DACH) has been in existence now for more than fifteen years since its re-establishment in 1994. This report provides an historical background on the archaeology of Palestine, an overview of its vision, inception, objectives, development and activities during this formative period. It gives an account of the archaeological fieldwork and projects currently being carried out in the Palestinian areas, including joint excavations, restoration projects and the state of preservation of archaeological and cultural heritage sites. This is an updated version of the article (A Decade of Archaeology in Palestine) published in 2005.

The inauguration in August, 1994, of the Department of Antiquities of Palestine under the Palestinian National Authority was a momentous event (Taha, 1998a, 1999, 2002, 2005 and 2008). In one sense, however, it may be considered the revival of the Department of Antiquities that was established in 1920 under the British Mandate. The authority was then terminated due to the political events of 1948 when Israel was established, while Jordan assumed those responsibilities for the West Bank and Egypt for the Gaza strip.

The beginning of 1970 witnessed for the first time the introduction of archaeological courses at Birzeit University, which had developed into a teaching program in the newly established Department of Archaeology by1980, which itself subsequently became the Institute of Archaeology at the end of 1980s. The Department of archaeology conducted a series of excavations at Tell Jenin and Tell Taannek (1976-1986). Other archaeological teaching programs were offered at Al-Najah University in Nablus and Al-Quds University in Jerusalem. Unfortunately, some of the teaching programs at Birziet University and Al-Najah University were not sustained, although some efforts have been made to revive them. A basic program of archaeology and an MA program for restoration is offered currently at Al-Quds University.

Following the Palestinian-Israeli agreement in 1993, Jericho and Gaza were handed over to Palestinian control. Subsequently in Autumn 1994 and December 1995 the Palestinian National Authority was given control throughout the West Bank and Gaza Strip of several spheres of responsibility, including archaeology in areas A and B. In some parts within area C powers and responsibilities over archaeology were to be transferred gradually to Palestinian jurisdiction. Under the terms of the Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government Arrangement for Palestinians, (Oslo Accords, 1993: article 1) these negotiations had to be completed by May 1999. Eventually, this was to include the entirety of Palestinian territory in the West Bank and Gaza. But unfortunately, the mutually agreed timetable for this transfer in the transitional period has been delayed and never implemented by the government of Israel. In the absence of a final peace agreement, Israel remains a military occupant in the occupied Palestinian territories, and therefore remains bound by provisions dealing with cultural property (Oyediran, 1997: 9-18) in the Hague Convention and Regulations of 1907, the Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949, the Hague Convention and Protocol of 1954, the UNESCO Recommendation On International Principles Applicable to Archaeological Excavations which was adopted by the UNESCO General Conference in its ninth session in New Delhi on 5 December 1956, and many other resolutions and recommendations concerning cultural property in the Palestinian occupied territories.

The DACH was established at a time and in circumstances of complex difficulties. It possessed neither archaeological records, nor any of the finds from archaeology previously undertaken on its soil. Neither did it have sufficient space, logistical support and equipment nor an archaeological library or maps. And because of inadequate opportunities for field training under occupation, the department has inherited a serious shortage in qualified personnel.

The new situation gives the Palestinians who won autonomy at the end of the last century an independent role to explore the history of Palestine from its primary sources, a task reserved until recently for foreign and Israeli archaeologists. This situation had often led to the political and ideological use of data and their interpretation without objective scientific controls. The establishment of a national management body for antiquities and cultural heritage (involving the Department of Antiquities, other academic programs, and non-governmental organizations) marks the beginnings of a local field school of archaeology.

The department is basing its efforts in research, education, preservation, and legislation on contemporary, internationally accepted standards. It is the modern humanistic understanding that views the integral role of Palestinian culture within human culture, making archaeology in Palestine a scientific enterprise within the setting of international scientific endeavour. A new participatory approach has been developed in Palestine, fostering the roles of official bodies, academics, non-governmental organizations and the community in safeguarding cultural heritage.

Cultural heritage represents the history and at the same time the identity of the Palestinian people. It is acknowledged as a resource that can initiate a chain of actions capable of creating jobs and income. At the same time cultural heritage is recognized as a means of attaining social integrity, and of creating a multicultural character of Palestinian society based on values of respect, tolerance, democracy and freedom.

Cultural heritage legislation

The old antiquities law was grounded in a conventional concept of archaeology, which effectively excludes the cultural heritage of the last three centuries (Taha, 2005). The new laws being invoked move beyond narrow definitions and ancient periods to include many different categories of cultural resources including archaeological sites, historical buildings and features, and significant vernacular architecture (Taha and Jaradat, 2009), viewed comprehensively within both physical and cultural contexts.

At its inception, the DACH inherited differing sets of archaeological legislation. In 1929, under the British Mandate, a common legislation Law of Antiquities (no. 51) was issued which replaced the existing Ottoman law. After the Israeli occupation of the West Bank and Gaza in 1967, the Israel military government issued a series of Military Orders many of which directly impacted on archaeology and the archaeological resources of the land. The most important of these was Military Order No. 119/1967, which revoked many of the principles of the old Antiquities Law No. 51 and placed all of the responsibilities of the Department of Antiquities under the military governor and his appointees. All permits and licenses issued before the June War of 1967 were thereby cancelled.

These various earlier laws are generally out of date and sometimes even contradict one another. Therefore, the DACH has worked in cooperation with governmental, non-governmental institutions, academics, to produce a new draft for an updated Law of Cultural Heritage that takes into consideration the scientific, legal and conceptual development of archaeology up to the present time. The new legislation emphasizes the integrity of different components of cultural heritage, and protects historical centers as well as cultural and natural landscapes.

This resituates the archaeology of Palestine within the universe of the international discipline, and will facilitate international archaeological research based on mutual interests. At the same time the new department has attended to its task of combating the looting of archaeological sites. Hundreds of archaeological sites have been looted and plundered (Ilan, Dahari and Avni, 1989) during the years of occupation, and there has been an active illegal trade in cultural property.

Many sites have been abandoned and left without any protection. Most importantly, there is a lack of awareness of the importance of cultural heritage among the public, due to the heavy impact of the political and ideological claims placed on archaeology by the occupiers and by the Israeli settlement policy. Archaeology is viewed by the average Palestinian as part of the occupation system. The new transformation of the role of archaeology and cultural heritage is evoking a chain of positive reactions in the Palestinian society.

Management structure of cultural heritage

The Department of Antiquities was established in 1994 and has sought ways to redress the above-mentioned inherited defects and to find their solutions, promoting a modern understanding of Palestinian cultural heritage. The department was restructured in 2002 following an agreement between the Ministry of Culture and the Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities, according to which the Department of Cultural Heritage in the Ministry of Culture merged with the DACH within the Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities.

In order to address the full range of obligations imposed by this new mandate, the DACH has defined for itself the following primary task areas, of institution building of the Department, formulating legislation to ensure protection of cultural resources, staff training to develop the necessary special capabilities within the departmental team, protection, management, conservation and restoration of archaeological sites and cultural heritage sites, expanding the museum sector and conducting a program of salvage excavations. The structure of the organization has been designed to facilitate performing these duties, consisting of the following divisions: excavations and survey, site management, inspection and licensing, national register, conservation and museums.

The Department of Antiquities and Cultural Heritage is working in cooperation with governmental and non-governmental bodies to preserve cultural heritage in Palestine. The main actors are the Palestinian universities and the non-governmental organizations working in the area of cultural heritage, including the Hebron Rehabilitation Committee, the Center for Cultural Preservation in Bethlehem, and Riwaq Center in Ramallah and the Welfare Association in Jerusalem. These institutions along with some other community initiatives are participating actively in the restoration, conservation and rehabilitation of historic centers.

site photo

Fig. 1: Israeli destruction of the historic centre of Hebron

Joint and salvage excavations

Excellent examples of the efficiency of international collaborations with the department have already been demonstrated in development projects and in the joint Palestinian-Dutch excavations at Kh. Bal’ama, the joint Palestinian-Italian excavation at Tell es-Sultan in Jericho (Marchetti, Nigro and Taha, 1999; Nigro and Taha, 2006), the Palestinian-Swedish excavation at Tell el-Ajjul and the Palestinian-French excavation at Anthedon, Tell es-Sakan (Miroschedji and Sadeq, 2001 and 2002). Other examples of joint cooperation have been the Joint Palestinian-Norwegian excavation at Tell el-Mafjer in Jericho and Palestinian-Swedish cooperation at Tell el-Ajjul (Fischer and Sadeq, 2001).

These joint projects have contributed to building a new postcolonial model of cooperation in archaeology based on mutual respect and interest. In 1999 a special volume of the French journal Dossiers di Archieologie (vol. 240) was dedicated to the new Palestinian experience. Preliminary and final reports on the results of these excavations have been published in a range of archaeological journals. Within this collaborative context, the project for the rehabilitation of Hisham’s Palace in Jericho (Piccirillo, 1989) was also established, in cooperation with UNESCO and with the financial support of the Italian government.

site photo

Fig. 2: Hisham’s palace in Jericho, mosaic floor

The Department of Antiquities has managed to undertake a series of salvage projects in the last twelve years. More than 500 salvage operations have been carried out in the Palestinian areas, especially in historical urban centers and in areas under high pressure (cf. Taha, 1997). A large number of tombs from different periods have been rescued, and a hoard of 420 silver coins from the early Ottoman period was uncovered in a rock shelter near the village of Qabatiya, south of Jenin (Taha, Pol and van der Kooij, 2006). In Gaza, salvage operations have been carried out at a number of sites, including the cemetery and the church of Jabalia, the site of Nuseirat and in different other locations in Gaza and Rafah, Deir el-Balah and Khan Yunis (Sadeq, 1999 and 2005; Humbert, 2000).

In 2000 and 2001, two seasons of excavations were carried out at the site of Tawaheen es-Sukkar in Jericho. A salvage excavation was conducted at the Monastery of Bir el-Hammam on Mount Gerzim. In 2003 and 2004, a series of excavations were carried out in the sites of Samoua village, Haram er-Rameh, Deir Ghannam, Tell Jenin, and Kh. el-Burj. In 2003 work was restarted in Gaza in the sites of Tell um Amer and Blakhiyeh under the framework of the Palestinian-French cooperation in Gaza (Humbert and Abu Hassuna, 1999). In 2006 a small-scale excavation was carried out at Kh. el-Mafjer to determine the stratigraphic history of the site. A series of salvage excavations were carried out in 2008 and 2009 in Nablus, Sabastia, Samou’a, Bethlehem, Hebron, Jericho, Taybeh and Khirbet Beit Bassa. Palestinian academic institutions participated actively in these efforts. Research and training excavations have been carried out by Birzeit University at Khirbet Birziet in 1998-2008, by the University of Al-Najah at Tell Sofar from 1996 to 2002, and by Al-Quds University at Khirbet Shuweika.

Preservation and conservation of cultural heritage

The other main task has been the conservation of the most endangered archaeological sites and historic buildings, and major projects have been carried out throughout the country. This has included, the Emergency Clearance Campaign of one Hundred Sites, 1996-1998 (Taha, 1998) and a project for the protection of cultural and historical landscape between 1998 and 2001, funded by the Dutch government to a value of 1.5 million USD. These two projects included major archaeological sites and historical buildings, as well as historic mosques, churches, monasteries, sanctuaries, and traditional buildings. They involved clearance work, documentation, consolidation, and conservation and salvage excavations of more than one hundred endangered archaeological and cultural heritage sites.

These sites have included the ancient churches of Burqin and Abud, both dating to the Byzantine period, and the Crusader churches of Sebastyah and el-Bireh. Historic mosques likewise being preserved include es-Sabeen and Burham from the Mamluke period, the Omari mosques at Dura and Birzeit, as well as the sanctuaries of El-Qatrawani and Maqam en-Nubani (Taha, 1998 and 2005).

Illustrative of the diversity of structures and sites that have been preserved are an 18th century castle in Ras-Karkar, the Crusader Kahn in el-Bireh, Mamluke bath in the old town of Hebron, the Ottoman Qaem-Maqam house in Tulkarem and Beit ez-Zarru villa in Ramallah (Taha, 1998). Maqam el-Qatrawani near Attara has also been conserved, together with the small natural forest and terraced landscape surrounding it. Similarly, the site of Dura el-Qarei possesses a combination of ecology and historical technology, displaying ancient and traditional hydrological features in its natural and cultural landscapes. Some historical buildings have also been restored to house ethnographic and archaeological museums or other types of cultural centers. Larger complexes with multiple dimensions are also being stabilized and developed, such as the villages of Deir Istyia and Artas.

Among well-known previously excavated sites in the West Bank and Gaza such as Tell Ta’annek, Tell el-Fara, Tell Dothan, Tell Balata, Tell en-Nasbeh, Tell et-Tell, Kh. Radana, and Tell el-Ajjul, some of these were left without protection during the thirty years of occupation. Clearance of some of these sites is being undertaken according to a plan to develop them into archaeological parks such as Tell Balata and the Crusader church of el-Bierh.

Within the framework of the Bethlehem 2000 projects (Abu Jidi and Diab, 1999; el-Hasan, 1999), a large project for the restoration and rehabilitation of archaeological sites and historical buildings in the Bethlehem area was carried out in cooperation with the UNDP and funded by the Japanese government by an amount of 2 million USD. As part of this project an ethnographic museum displaying the history of oil production was established in the old city of Bethlehem. In Gaza a comprehensive restoration and rehabilitation work was carried out in the historic palace of Qaser el-Basha. Another project was carried in 2004 and 2005 at seven locations in the northern districts in Palestine with funding from USAID of ca. 2.5 million USD (Taha, 2004), including the sites of Kh. Bal’ama, Burqin, Arraba, Deir Istyia, Barqawi Castle, and the villages of Irtah and Kur.

In 2005, a series of restorations and consolidation work were carried out in the Mamluke castle of Khan Yunis. In 2007 the exhibition “Gaza at the Crossroad of Civilizations”, was organized in Geneva within a framework of Palestinian-Swiss cooperation, after seven years of the Paris exhibition and more than a century of archaeological research in Gaza. The exhibition consists of 229 artifacts uncovered in the major excavations at Tell Umm Amer, Blakhyieh, Jabalia, and Tell es-Sakan between 1995-2006, as well as private collection items.

Since 1967 thousand of archaeological artifacts have been uncovered and removed from various sites in Gaza city, Deir el-Balah, Tell er-Ruqeish, Tell Ridan, Tell Qatif and elsewhere. The exhibition has a dual significance; it shows the wealth and diverse history of Gaza and marks at the same time an initial step toward realization of a Gaza archaeological museum.

Destruction of cultural heritage

Since October 2000 great damage has been inflicted on cultural heritage sites in the Palestinian areas (Taha, 2005). These sites have suffered military bombing, with shelling causing partial or even total destruction. Attacks on cultural heritage sites have intensified since the last major incursions in April 2002 and January 2004, causing irreparable damage, especially in the historic towns and cities, including Bethlehem, Hebron, Gaza, Beit Jala, Tulkarem, Salfit, Jenin, Gaza, Rafah, Abud, and Nablus. Sieges, curfews, roadblocks and military closures imposed on the Palestinian cities and villages have prevented the DACH from attending to its tasks in the protection of cultural heritage. Many archaeological sites and historical buildings have been the target of Israeli military attacks, including during the last war on Gaza, when the ancient Gaza port Anthedon, the Ottoman building of Dar es-Sariai and the governor’s house were damaged.

Another major threat has been caused by the separation wall constructed by Israel in the occupied Palestinian territories, including in and around Jerusalem. It is a huge system composed of concrete walls, razor wire, trenches and fences, cutting into the West Bank and Gaza and separating people from their land and history. Besides its direct human, economic and social negative impact on Palestinian life, the separation wall has had a devastating impact on the rich archaeological remains, cultural heritage sites and most importantly the cultural landscape of Palestine.

The projected wall will encircle Palestinian population centers in a series of disconnected blocks. Through the 462 Israeli settlements inside the Palestinian areas Israel already controls more than 900 archaeological sites and features, and after building the wall this number will rise to 4,500, including ca. 500 major archaeological sites, which constitute ca. 50% of the cultural resources of the Palestinian areas.

photo of separation wall

Fig. 3: The Separation Wall, East Jerusalem

World Heritage projects in Palestine

Following the events of April and May 2002 in the Palestinian Territories, especially the prolonged siege of the Nativity Church and the destruction of the old center of the city of Nablus during the Israeli incursion, the World Heritage Committee expressed its concern over the possible destruction and damage of Palestinian Heritage at its 26th session in Budapest (June 2002). The committee recognized the outstanding universal values of Palestinian heritage and approved an amount of 150.000 USD for supporting Palestinian cultural and natural heritage in order to assist the Palestinian Authority in establishing an inventory of potential World Cultural and Natural Heritage places (DACH, 2005; Taha, 2009).

As part of this plan, a training workshop on the implementation of the World Heritage Convention was undertaken at ICCROM in Rome in September 2003, with the participation of 16 specialists in cultural and natural heritage from various Palestinian institutions. Most of the trainees were involved in the preparation of the tentative list and associated activities. The present list includes 20 cultural and natural heritage sites (16 cultural heritage sites, 3 natural sites and one mixed site). The list reflects the cultural and natural diversity of Palestine and its importance nationally and internationally.

References

Abu Jidi, N and M Diab 1999 La restoration des zones archeologiques et des batiments historiques de Bethleem. Dossiers de Archeologie 240:88.

Oslo Accords 1993 Declaration of Principles on Interim Self-Government for Palestinians. Washington, DC, 13 September 1993.

Fisher, P and M Sadeq 2001 Tell el-Ajjul 1999, First Season Preliminary Report. Egypt and the Levant 10:211-226.

el-Hasan, N 1999 Le Programme Bethleem 2000. Dossiers di Archeologie 240:89.

Humbert, J-B and Y Abu Hassuna 1999 Fouilles d’Anthedon (Balakhiyeh). Dossiers di Archeologie 240:52-53.

Humbert, J-B 2000 Gaza Mediterraneenne. Historie et Archeologie en Palestine. Editions Errance, Paris.

DACH 2005 Inventory of Cultural and Natural Heritage Sites of Potential Outstanding Universal Value in Palestine. The Department of Antiquities and Cultural Heritage, Ramallah.

Ilan, D, U Dahari and G Avni 1989 Plundered! The Rampant Rape of Israel’s Archaeological Sites. Biblical Archeology Review XV(March/April):38, 42.

Marchetti, N, L Nigro and H Taha 1999 The Findings of the Italian-Palestinian Excavations, MAPI, Milan.

Miroschedji, P and M Sadeq 2001 Fouilles de Tell es Sakan (Gaza), Paleorient 72(2):75-104.

Nigro, L and H Taha (eds.) 2006 Tell es-Sultan/Jericho in the Context of the Jordan Valley, Site Management, Conservation and Sustainable Development, ROSAPAT 02, Rome.

Oyediran, J 1997 Plunder, Destruction and Despoliation. An Analysis of Israel’s Violations of the International Law of Cultural Property in the Occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip. Al-Haq, Ramallah.

Piccirillo, M 1989 Le Qaser Hisham (Khirbet el-Mafjar) a Jericho. Dossiers de Archeologie
240:115-123.

Sadeq, M 1999 Antiquites de Gaza. Dossiers de Archeologie 240:46-51.

Sadeq, M 2000 The City of Gaza and the Surroundings Area during the Roman-Byzantine Period, Adamatu2:27-42.

Sadeq, M 2002 The Historical Monuments of Gaza Strip. Mediterraneum vol. 2, edited by Fabio Maniscalco, Massa editore: 243-259.

Sadeq, M 2005 Recent Archaeological Survey and Excavations in Gaza region. Mediterraneum vol. 5, edited by Fabio Maniscalco, 5, Massa editore: 245-264.

Taha, H 1997 A Salvage Excavation at the Abudiyeh Church in Abud. Liber Annus 47:359-374.

Taha, H 1998 The Emergency Clearance Campaign of One Hundred Sites in Palestine. Al-Muhandis 42:36-40.

Taha, H 1998a The Palestinian Department of Antiquities, Two Years of Archaeology in Palestine. Quaderni di Gerico 1:3-7.

Taha, H 1999 Le Departement des Antiquites de Palestine. Dossiers d Archeologie 240:14-17. (see also L’eglise d’Abud: 125-127, Le Maqam esh-Sheik en-Nubani: 128, Le Palais de Ras Ibn Samhan: 128-129, La Musee de Ramallah: 129, Naplouse: 134-136, L’ eglise de Burkin: 145)

Taha, H 2002 Das “Palestinian Department of Antiquities” in den Jahren von 1994 bis 2000. ZDPV 118:105-106.

Taha, H 2004 Managing Cultural Heritage, UNDP Focus 1:31-32.

Taha, H 2005 A Decade of Archaeology in Palestine. In F Maniscalco (ed.), Tutela, conservazione e valorizzazione del patrimonio culturale della Palestin from the series "Mediterraneum: Tutela e valorizzazione dei beni culturali ed ambientali", vol. 5, Naples, pp. 63-71.

Taha, H, A Pol and G van der Kooij 2006 A Hoard of Silver Coins at Qabatiya, Palestine, Khirbet Bal’ama Archeological Project: Report of the 1996-2000 Excavations and Surveys, Ramallah.

Taha, H 2008 The Palestinian Department of Antiquities and Cultural Heritage, Minerva Magazine, January and February 2008.

Taha, H and M Jaradat 2009 Inventories in Palestine, In Proceedings of the Workshop on Inventories,Euromed Heritage IV, Paris.

Taha, H (ed.) 2009 Inventory of Cultural and Natural Heritage Sites of Potential Outstanding Universal Value in Palestine. 2nd edition. Ministry of Tourism and Antiquities. Ramallah.

Refbacks


ISSN: 1759-2941 | Published by Ubiquity Press | Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

TAHA, H.. The Current State of Archaeology in Palestine. Present Pasts, North America, 2, jul. 2010. Available at: <http://www.presentpasts.info/article/view/pp.17/34>. Date accessed: 13 Nov. 2011.

Tuesday, November 8, 2011

Al-Bushra: THE FORGOTTEN FAITHFUL: PALESTINIAN CHRISTIANS Dr Anthony McRoy

THE FORGOTTEN FAITHFUL: PALESTINIAN CHRISTIANS

Dr Anthony McRoy

1. Origins of the Palestinian Christians

The Palestinians are the descendants of everyone who ever lived in the land, just as modern Britons are descendants of ancient Celts, Saxons, Vikings, Normans, Huguenots, Jews and recent migrants from the Caribbean and south Asia. Indeed, Palestinians are largely of Israelite stock – they are simply culturally Arabised. This is demonstrably true by observing the existence of Palestinian Christians and Samaritans, who clearly did not derive from the Hejaz or Najd. As Rev. Dr. Naim Ateek, Director, Sabeel Ecumenical Liberation Theology Center, Jerusalem, has stated:

The Palestinian Christians of today are the descendants of [the] early Christians... Palestinian Christians of today are the present generation of that great cloud of witnesses to Jesus who came before them and who will, God willing, come after them until Christ comes again. They and their ancestors have maintained a living witness to Jesus and his Resurrection from the beginning of the Church, and they should see themselves dynamically continuing such a witness in the land, witnesses to the Resurrection.

This needs to be asserted over against deceitful ‘Christian Zionist’ propaganda. For example, an extremist body, ‘Christian Friends of Israel’, has repeated the Zionist lie that the Palestinians are the result of ‘large scale immigration of Arabs into Palestine from the surrounding countries that has occurred in modern times.’ Their main source for this dishonest claim is Joan Peters’ volume From Time Immemorial. CFI nowhere acknowledge that the book has been roundly denounced by historians such as Albert Hourani as a ‘ludicrous and worthless book’, and the devastating work of Dr Norman Finklestein, The Protocols of Joan Peters. CFI quote the Hope-Simpson Report in evidence of their position, clearly second-hand from Peters’ work, whereas as Finklestein observes, her references to it are ‘falsified’. Had CFI read Finklestein’s critique, they might have noticed that she regards the term ‘Christian-Arab’ as a contradiction, an ‘Arab propaganda claim’ (p. 250). The Israeli historian Tom Segev notes the origin of this lie: ‘The Zionist Organization also initiated research projects designed to prove that many of the Arabs had arrived in Palestine only recently’. However, Ben-Gurion and other Zionists originally claimed – accurately – that the Palestinians were actually descendants of the ancient Jews. The very fact that there are Palestinian Christians undermines the assertions of CFI, since they are largely not Copts, not Maronites, and obviously not Muslims!

Whereas in 1922 Christians made up 52% of the population of Jerusalem, they now represent just 2.5% of Jerusalemites. More Palestinian Christians born in Jerusalem now live in Sydney, Australia than there are remain in Jerusalem. In all of modern Palestine at the beginning of this century, Christians composed over 20 percent of the population. Today they amount to less than two per cent. Christians constitute about 500,000 of the Palestinians around the globe, there being about 5 million Palestinians. Over 50,000 Christians live in the West Bank and Gaza. There are around 115,000 Israeli Arab Christians. The biggest group is the Greek Catholic Uniates, then the Greek Orthodox, other Uniates including the Latins and Maronites (the latter mainly in the north). There are Episcopalians (Anglicans), an ancient Armenian community that was reinforced by refugees from the 1915 genocide, and there are also Assyrians, Copts, and Protestant groups such as Baptists and Pentecostals.

2. Palestinian Christian History

Palestinian Christians played a great role in Church History. The great Christian Apologist Justin Martyr (c. 100-165), who endeavoured to both bridge the gap between Greek philosophy and Christianity and also to dialogue with Jews was a native of Neapolis, modern Nablus. Assyrian Christians trace their conversion to Addai, who was a Palestinian. The world’s first monastery was founded in 190 in Gaza by Helarion. Caesarea in Palestine was the venue for an important theological study centre, a catechetical school. Amongst those who graced it were the famous theologian of the early church Origen and Jerome, the great translator of the Bible. Eusebius of Caesarea (d. 339) wrote the first major history of the Church, The Ecclesiastical History. Palestine has a long history of providing martyrs as demonstrated by Eusebius’ history of the events of the persecution of Christians by the Emperor Diocletian entitled The Martyrs of Palestine.

Palestinian Christians suffered persecution and the destruction of churches again in 614-628 when the Persians captured Palestine from the Byzantine Empire. The Persians set up an self-governing Jewish polity which helped implement this policy. The Byzantine conquest was short-lived, for the Arab Muslims captured Jerusalem in 637. Sophronius, the Greek Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem, handed the keys of the city to Caliph Umar. The Caliph promised religious liberty, security and access to the holy places. Christians were exempted from paying taxes. The Palestinians were gradually culturally Arabised, but Islam did not become the majority religion until the 13th century. During the Crusades, Palestinian Christians fought against the invaders alongside the Muslims and Jews. Salah ad-Din recaptured Jerusalem in 1187, and restored the Greek Orthodox churches to their original owners from the Frankish Catholics.

To this we may add a modern Palestinian Christian martyr - Alex Odeh. Odeh, 41, who migrated to America in 1972, receiving citizenship in 1977, was Southern California Regional Director of the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC). On October 11, 1985, a powerful pipe-bomb trip-wired to office door, killed him and injured seven others. According to press reports, FBI investigators identified three members of the US Jewish Defense League - Robert Manning, Keith Fuchs, and Andy Green - as the chief suspects in Odeh’s killing. They fled America to the extremist West Bank settlement of Kiryat Arba near Hebron. Manning was later extradited on a separate charge, the extradition-terms believed to prevent his prosecution on the Odeh case. The others are currently Israeli army reservists. ADC has repeatedly met with top FBI officials during the past years: ‘We have been assured that the case has been given “top priority” and that leads … are still being actively pursued. Yet, not one arrest has been made and no one has been brought to justice.’ The National Association of British Arabs regretted that America has not pursued ‘its avowed policy of justice with equal consistency for all its citizens by its refusal to seek the extradition of the murderers of Alex Odeh. This raises the obvious question of whether justice is dependent upon the ethnicity of both the victim and the perpetrators of this crime.’ In Santa Ana, a statue has been erected to Odeh, and ADC established a ‘Humanitarian Award’ in his honour.

The exodus of Palestinian Christians began with the withdrawal of the British mandate forces and the war of 1948. Around 55,000 or 60% of the Palestinian Christian community fled or were driven from their homes, along with 650,000 Muslim Palestinians. As Israel occupied West Jerusalem it was the Christian Palestinians who were disproportionately made refugees. Nonetheless, Christians have been in the forefront of the resistance to Zionist ethnic cleansing and Apartheid. The late George Habash, leader of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, was a member of the Greek Orthodox church. The academic and Arab league representative Hanan Ashrawi is an Episcopalian. The human rights activists Jonathan Kuttab is an evangelical Episcopalian. Perhaps the most famous Palestinian Christian is the Episcopalian academic, Edward Said.

The Christian villages of Beit Jala and Beit Sahour have been particularly targeted by the Israeli occupation forces. Churches have been desecrated, as happened recently at Bethlehem’s Church of the Nativity, where in a demonstration of Christian-Muslim co-operation between Palestinians, the church gave sanctuary to Muslim mujahideen. Zionist attacks on Palestinian Christians is nothing new. There are two books published in recent years by the Palestinian Melkite priest Elias Chacour, who comes from Biram in Galilee, Blood Brothers (1984) and We belong to the Land (1990). He confirms a story not even the Israelis dispute, but which never gets mentioned by Christian Zionists. Biram and Ikrit were two Christian villages that submitted to Israeli rule in 1948. Israeli soldiers asked them to move out temporarily, but after the armistice refused to let them return. Despite receiving a Supreme Court decision allowing their return in 1952, the military obstructed this and dynamited the entire two villages, whose land was then handed to Jewish settlements. Golda Meir, whilst Premier, rejected their right of return, (even though the Supreme Court again found in their favour in 1972), on the grounds that ‘the villagers were gentiles - Maronite and Greek (Melkite) Catholics. Their lands were now occupied by Jewish immigrants. Allowing the original residents to return and rebuild, she noted, would therefore be an erosion of Zionist values.’ Thus ‘Zionist values’ involved dispossession and anti-Arab discrimination. A proper response for Britons is if their towns could be twinned with Bethlehem, Beit Jala and Beit Sahour.

The greatest threat to a continued Christian presence has been the racist and sectarian policies of the Zionist regime which are resulting in increasing Christian emigration. Rev. Sizer has noted that the emigration rate of Palestinian Christians is twice that of Muslims, simply because they tend to be better educated, receive sympathetic treatment from Western governments or have relatives already living in the West. Muslim Palestinians are more likely to have family connections in other parts of the Middle East, whereas Christian Palestinians are encouraged by Israel to emigrate to America, Canada or Australia, where they have historically received a sympathetic reception. Consequently the new diaspora of Palestinian Christians who have integrated into Western society act as a magnet for others seeking a more secure future than possible under Israeli military occupation.

Ominously, he records a study undertaken recently by Bethlehem University revealed that a further 20% of Palestinian Christians plan to emigrate in the near future. He continues:

Emigration is, according to many, entirely a consequence of the antagonistic and repressive actions of the Israeli authorities. The bombing and then occupation of the Christian villages of Beit Jala and Beit Sahour have merely increased that flow. It is also the systematic policy of the Israeli government to remove the residence permits of Jerusalemite Palestinians when ever possible. It has become a one way revolving door that allows them out but denies them re-entry. Israel achieves this depopulation of East Jerusalem by denying or removing the residence permits of Palestinians forced to work in other parts of the West Bank or who leave temporarily to study, visit family members or marry abroad.

Should this trend continue, only the Christian buildings of Palestine will be left – provided the Zionist regime does not destroy them. The situation is not helped by Christian tourism, which bolsters the Israeli economy. This is especially unethical since the airport at which they land is Lod. Traditionally, the patron saint of Palestine, St. George, was martyred in Lydda. Lod airport is built on the site on the massacre and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians in Lydda and Ramleh. I have complained to London’s Christian radio station Premier about their organising such tours that land at this airport and thus desecrate the memory of the victims of this massacre, but to no avail. It is just like the Serbs establishing an airport on the graves of the victims of Srebrenice, or Al-Qaida doing likewise at New York’s Ground Zero. Conversely, a general boycott of the regime could encourage Palestinian Christians to stay and even return.

3. ‘Christian’ Zionism

It is frequently a focus of pro-Zionist propaganda to portray the Palestinian struggle against ethnic cleansing, Apartheid and for self-determination as an Islamic plot. So-called Christian Zionist propaganda is especially keen on this. Last year I received a letter from a Christian supporter of Zionism objecting to an article I wrote in a Christian magazine about the Intifada:

May I also suggest you read the Scriptures and take your stance from there and not from Islamic adherents who hate the Jewish nation. What makes you as a Christian want to spread Islamist propanganda [sic]about God’s people?

She sent me this piece from a leading Christian Zionist: ‘The PLO is an Islamic terrorist organization.’ Which must come as news to His Excellency Afif Safieh (a Catholic) or Hana Ashrawi (an Anglican). – ‘the PLO may be secular but they are profoundly influenced by Muslim incitement and Muslim doctrines.’ How are Palestinian Christians in the PLO ‘profoundly influenced by Muslim incitement and Muslim doctrines’? If it is simply fear of Islam that explains Zionist oppression, how come Palestinian Christians are treated equally badly? Similarly, the so-called ‘International Christian Embassy to Jerusalem’ states the following:

The Islamic claim to Jerusalem, including its exclusive claim to the Temple Mount, is in direct contradiction to the clear biblical and historical significance of the city and its holiest site, and this claim is of later religio-political origin rather than arising from any Qur’anic text or early Muslim tradition...

A newsletter published in 1987, for example, listed five ways in which the ICEJ supporters could ‘come against the spirit of Islam’. Patrick Goodenough, of the ICEJ’s Middle East Digest responded to a critical report published in the Church of England Newspaper, with the following,

Corley speaks of the local churchmen who are critical of the ICEJ’s ‘political interpretations of Scripture’. Point: many Palestinian clergy have long used the Scripture to back their pro-PLO positions. They have stood quietly by as Yasser Arafat labelled Jesus ‘the first Palestinian revolutionary’ and - as recently as March - while his followers erected three crosses at a protest site in Jerusalem. We hear no church voices decrying such blasphemous abuse of the symbols of our faith by the followers of another.

Neil Cohen, vicar of Christ Church, Jerusalem, said this in a recent public debate with Rev. Dr. Steve Sizer:

Partnership of Jew and Arab is untenable in Israel... we live in an age of political correctness which claims we live in a world where all people have equal rights. I don't agree with that because I don't think it squares with the biblical record... the search for peace in the Middle East, laudable though it is, is a wild goose chase.

In his book The Uniqueness of Israel Lance Lambert, one of the best known Christian Zionists, discusses the ethnic background of the Palestinians, and acknowledges that many of are Israelite descent. However, this is not good enough for him, because, he says, they have interbred with the ‘seed of Ishmael’. Let us be clear what he is saying. Because the Palestinians are of mixed ancestry, he feels they have no right to live in Palestine. The logic of his position is that their Israelite ancestors effectively ‘demoted’ themselves by engaging in an inter-ethnic marriage, even if those ancestors were Jewish Christians who married Gentile Christians.

Christian Zionists tend to ignore Palestinian Christians because it undermines their Islamophobic propaganda. They ignore that Arab nationalism was expressed in ‘Muslim-Christian Associations’, and a leading Arab Christian, Sakakini, ascended the al-Aqsa pulpit to protest a visit by Balfour. They also ignore that Zionism was also a sectarian ideology: ‘In another incident, the editor of Do ‘ar HaYom … was put on trial for slandering the Christian religion… Hans Herzl, the son of the founder of the Zionist movement, had converted to Christianity. Do’ar Ha Yom commented that, unlike Jesus of Nazareth, Herzl’s son was at least not a bastard’, (what do Christian Zionists make of that?).

Don Wagner, a leading US Evangelical critic of Christian Zionism, denounces ICEJ without reservation: ‘Thus the ICEJ is a pseudo-Christian movement that attempts to baptize a modern political ideology with some Scripture and revisionist Christian dispensational theology’. It is noteworthy that when the Palestinian human rights activist Elias Chacour met anti-Apartheid activist Archbishop Desmond Tutu, in 1986, the latter informed the former that the situation of Palestinians was worse than that of Black South Africans – something he would not have said lightly. Professor Yvonne Haddad observes that the Israeli state insists ‘on Jewish identity as a prerequisite for citizenship ….not only bans the return of Palestinian gentiles to their homeland, but also restricts its Christian and Muslim citizens to specified living areas and limits their access to resources which are monopolized and confiscated by the state (such as education, water, and land).’ Hence, the Law of Return applies only to Jews; a Jew from London can immediately migrate to Haifa or even the West Bank; an Israeli Arab, born in Haifa, if he emigrates, can never return, even if he served in the army and was decorated for bravery – even if he saved the life of the Prime Minister.

Sizer notes how the International Christian Embassy works closely with the Israeli government, even lobbying the US Government on the latter’s behalf. Essentially, the International Christian Embassy, and Christian Zionists in general, fulfil the same role the Dutch Reformed Church performed for South African Apartheid – providing a theological justification for state-instituted racial discrimination and dispossession. Christian Zionists are the Dutch Reformed Church of Israeli Apartheid. In the Old Testament, permanent resident aliens were equal citizens - Leviticus 19:10, Deuteronomy 21:10, N.B: 24:14 – God commanded one law for both, something clearly not practised by the Zionist regime. God condemns oppression of the alien - Jeremiah 7:6, Malachi 3:5. The Covenant was for all humanity - Genesis 12:3ff, 2 Samuel 7:19. All men are descended from Adam. In the New Testament, there is a higher resolution of this – there are no aliens; Ephesians 2:11-16 - Christ unites humanity - He reconciles Man to God and men to each other.

Theological Racism – such as Christian Zionism – is a denial of reconciling work of Christ. In Christ, all are one; racism seeks to divide Man, and because of this, and because of Peter’s revelation that God has no ethnic favourites, Acts 10:34, racism is both sin and ‘Christian’ racism is heresy. In the past ‘Christian’ racism employed Genesis 9:20-25 – the curse on Ham to justify anti-Black racism, and Mt. 27:25 to further anti-Jewish racism. Anti-Arabism is the last acceptable theological racism, specifically perpetrated by Christian Zionists. Biblical texts concerning Ishmael are wrenched out of context to excuse anti-Arab oppression. Where all forms of theological racism fall is that Man is made the image of God, Genesis 9:5-6. Since Man is the image of God, to attack Man on the basis of his humanity – as racism does - is to attack God, and is therefore sinful. Christian Zionism is guilty of this, by attacking Arabs for what they are, and thus is sinful and heretical.

4. Biblical perspective on the Land

On the question of land in theological terms, it was always the will of God to dwell among His people; the Covenant formula - ‘I will be their God, they will be My people, and I will dwell in their midst’ - demanded it, and it was the purpose of the Exodus - Exodus 29:46. This place was sanctified because of theophany - the manifestation of God; this is seen in the theophany to Moses, Exodus 3:5 and to Joshua, and in Joshua 5.15, where the ground is sanctified because of the Divine Presence. Likewise, the Land of Canaan was sanctified because it was elect of God and indwelt by Him. Zion was the Place from which He reigned, and in terms of His Elect, this reign demanded and exerted moral transformation - sanctification, the Life of God, the quality of life demanded by Him.

The Promise of the Land is an integral part of the Covenant-oath, and it plays an important role in prophecy, e.g. in Jeremiah 7:7, especially when subsumed under the Earth, Isaiah 66:22, etc. The message of the Prophets is that worship must be holy and this means it must be accompanied by ethical conformity to the Law of the King, which of course, is only to be accomplished through regeneration; life in the Holy Land - i.e. in the divine Presence, which is the Holy Spirit, is dependent on this quality of Life, and conversely, the Land is the key to covenant-life in God for the corporate Body of the Elect. Indeed, the Land of Promise is thus equated with Life and the Holy Spirit: the Promise of Land is the Promise of the Spirit is the Promise of Life. Hence, in the New Testament, references to the Spirit sometimes employ the terminology of Land - e.g. Ephesians 1:13-14 (promise, inheritance, possession), or Matthew 25:46 - the righteous enter into the renewed earth - the Place of eternal Life, and the Promise is equated with eternal life - 1 John 2:25. In the New Testament, the Land is expanded to include the entire globe, and heaven is also spoken of as our inheritance. Ultimately, all of this is subsumed under the New Heavens and New Earth, the dwelling-place of ‘righteousness’ - - dikaiosyne, Hebrew tsedeqa - not only forensic conformity to divine standards, but the ‘right order’ - the Reign of God. Thus the New Earth is the Holy Land in the Final State.

The touchstone of error is the person and work of Christ. In Christ, all promises are fulfilled - 2 Corinthians 1:20, Galatians 3:16. He is the substance of Old Testament rituals and the Old Testament is fulfilled in Him, Matthew 5:17. Essentially, human beings only inherit the promises to Abraham through their union with Christ, Galatians 3:26-29, which is through regeneration and the obedience of faith. All Old Testament prophecy and its promises pointed to Christ, and depended upon Him. He is the unique eschatological Seed of Abraham, - Galatians 3:16 makes it clear that the promises were made to the unique Seed, not to the multitudinous offspring. People become the heirs of Abraham through participation in His work, v29. Since Christian Zionism dilutes Christ’s unique position this by ascribing the promises to someone – or rather a number of people – other than Jesus alone, and does so on the basis of race rather than faith in Christ alone, it is guilty of heresy.

New Oxford Review: EDITORIAL Christian Zionists: False Friends of Israel

New Oxford Review: EDITORIAL
Christian Zionists: False Friends of Israel




EDITORIAL
Christian Zionists: False Friends of Israel

December 2006 By Dale Vree



Stephen Sizer is the Vicar of Christ Church (presumably evangelical Anglican) in Surrey, England. In his book Christian Zionism: Road-map to Armageddon? (InterVarsity Press; 800-843-7225), he states in his Preface: "The seeds of this book were sown thirty years ago when, as a young Christian, I remember devouring Hal Lindsey's best-selling book, The Late Great Planet Earth.... The Jews, the 'chosen people,' had been brought back to their promised land in 1948.... The prophetic signs were being fulfilled on the front pages of our newspapers. The world seemed to be rushing towards a cataclysmic end in the great battle of Armageddon." Over those thirty years, Sizer has changed his mind.

So, what is Christian (Protestant) Zionism? There are many variants (as is typical of Protestantism). Most believe that the Jewish people who reject Christ are still unconditionally the Chosen People of God; they believe that for the Jewish people the Old Covenant is still valid; they believe that there are Two Chosen People, Israel and the Church -- some make Israel and America God's Chosen People, leaving out the Church. Either way, it is heresy.

Christian Zionist eschatology (i.e., the theology of the end of the world) is basically dispensational premillennialism. This is also heresy. Catholic eschatology is amillennialism.

Christian Zionists believe that Christians will be raptured into Heaven prior to Armageddon; and they believe in a literal 1,000-year reign of Christ on earth. In order to accomplish the rapture, they believe that present-day Israel must be supported unconditionally. They believe that Israel may make territorial claims from the Nile to the Euphrates rivers -- even at the expense of the U.S. -- because then Armageddon, the final, earth-ending battle between good and evil, will occur. Christian Zionist Benny Hinn said on NBC's Dateline in March 2005 that "This is not a war between Jews and Arabs. It is a war between God and the Devil."

The prominent leaders of Christian Zionism are Pat Robertson, Jerry Falwell, Tim LaHaye, Hal Lindsey, Oral Roberts, Kenneth Copeland, Paul Crouch, Benny Hinn, James Dobson, Jim Bakker, Jimmy Swaggart, Ralph Reed, and Jews for Jesus.

There are between 25 to 30 million Christian Zionists in America, far more than the number of Jewish Zionists. Sizer affirms that Christian Zionism is the fastest growing cult -- yes, cult -- in the U.S.

Pat Robertson hopes to televise the Second Coming of Christ. Not reported in Sizer's book, however, was that Robertson said that former Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's massive stroke in January 2006 was God's punishment: "He [Sharon] was dividing God's land. And I would say, 'Woe unto any Prime Minister of Israel who takes a similar course to appease the E.U., the United Nations, or the United States of America.' God says, 'This land belongs to me.'" Robertson places the interests of Israel above the U.S. -- but in the end, his concern is evangelical, fundamentalist, and pentecostal Christians (the majority in the world being Americans) being raptured.

This Christian Zionist eschatology is heretical from the Catholic point of view, and Sizer says that it may even be heretical from his Protestant point of view.

Regarding the end of the world, Jesus said, "But of that day and hour no one knows, no, not even the angels of heaven, but My Father only" (Mt. 24:36); and Jesus also said, "It is not for you to know the times or seasons which the Father has put in His own authority" (Acts 1:7). Jesus also said, "for the Son of Man is coming at an hour when you do not expect Him" (Mt. 24:44), and "Watch therefore, for you know neither the day nor the hour in which the Son of Man is coming" (Mt. 25:13). Regarding the Second Coming, St. Peter said, "But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night..." (2 Pet. 3:10); and St. Paul said, "For you yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so comes as a thief in the night" (1 Thess. 5:2). The Catechism says, "This eschatological coming could be accomplished at any moment..." (#673). Yes, there are signs of the Second Coming, but woe to those who think they can predict it. Christian Zionists want to force God's hand -- as if they could.

Throughout the ages, but especially now, goofy Christians have been setting the dates -- or approximate dates -- for Armageddon and the Second Coming. According to The New York Times (Dec. 27, 1987), in 1980 Pat Robertson predicted that the battle of Armageddon would begin in 1982 (indeed, your Editor saw him do this on TV). No wonder the New Testament repeatedly warns about false prophets.

Christian Zionism is an elephantine form of Gnosticism, for it presumes to eschatologically decode the Bible, and give secret knowledge (i.e., gnosis). Christian Zionism makes the gnostic DaVinci Code, which is mere fiction, look like small peanuts.

According to Christian Zionism, at the end of the world, the Antichrist will arise and the Jews in Israel will suffer a seven-year tribulation. Only a minority of Jews will convert to Christ; the majority of Jews will be slaughtered. Christians will be raptured into Heaven just before Armageddon begins, leaving the Jews in a horrible state. Christian Zionist Charles Ryrie says it will be "Israel's greatest bloodbath." Are Christian Zionists really pro-Jewish, pro-Israel? It's obvious that Christian Zionists are false friends of Israel.

Christian Zionism predates Jewish Zionism by at least 60 years. Christian Zionism is not concerned with giving the Jews a homeland. It is concerned about something else: The Christian Zionists just want to be raptured. How nice! Who wants to suffer a terminal illness and die?

One of the Christian Zionists' favorite texts in the Bible is, "I will bless those who bless you [Israel] and I will curse him who curses you..." (Gen. 12:3). In other words, they believe God will continue to bless America as long as it supports Israel. (Of course, the context of Genesis 12:3 does not suggest that it applies to future generations -- especially since most current Israelis are secular Jews.) But in the end, it's all about Christians Zionists, so they can be raptured.

In Christian Zionist eschatology, the Jews are still "God's Chosen People," but Tim LaHaye says that the plight of the Jews at Armageddon "will certainly be far worse than the Spanish Inquisition...or even the Holocaust of Adolf Hitler." Does this make sense?

But this is in part what drives U.S. foreign policy in the Mid-East. All this intense pressure from Christian Zionists for Armageddon makes peace in the Mid-East almost impossible. Christian Zionists go on and on about the Muslim concept of jihad (holy war). But the Christian Zionists also want holy war. And it's worse than any Muslim jihad: They want Armageddon, the ultimate holy war.

Christian Zionist John Walvoord says that at least 750 million people will perish at Armageddon. That dwarfs the number of unborn babies who have died by abortion. The Christian Zionists could unleash a nuclear war in the Mid-East. And no, it would probably not be the end of the world. The way things are going in the Mid-East, it could happen. This is no laughing matter.

On July 18-20, 2006, Christians United for Israel (CUFI) brought 3,500 pro-Israeli Protestants to Washington, D.C. Televangelist John Hagee founded CUFI, and the executive board includes Jerry Falwell and Gary Bauer. According to American Prospect Online (July 19), "Texas televangelist John Hagee, an Armageddon prophesier,...insists that military confrontation with Iran is foretold in the Bible as a necessary precondition for the Second Coming.... Hagee has spent the past six months mobilizing popular support for a war with Iran." Among the speakers were Republican Party Chairman Ken Mehlman and Senator Rick Santorum.

Where are the critiques of Christian Zionism by neocon Catholic periodicals? They consider Christian Zionists "ecumenical" allies; in part they are (their opposition to abortion, homosexual "marriage," etc.), but they don't point out Christian Zionists' heresies. We commend the neocon National Catholic Register (Sept. 24-30) for printing an op-ed piece that points out one of their heresies.

Long ago the NOR warned our readers about Christian Zionism. Recently we did so briefly (New Oxford Notes, Nov. 2006). We are among the few Catholic periodicals willing to do so at all.

Again, we plead for our readers to support the NOR. As you know, as of September 2005, we've been trying to raise $176,000 (so far we have reached $122,175). Much of what we're asking for is for our reconstructed website (where you can subscribe or renew -- or make a donation -- by credit card). At present our website is a huge financial drain. We hope that in time it will pay for itself. At our website, you will find our Archives, our Ad Gallery, NOR Dossiers, our En Español section, the NOR Gear Shoppe, our New Oxford News Link, and the current issue. Some are free and some you have to pay for. For an additional $10 annual fee above the print subscription price, you get everything. That access, however, may only be ordered online with a credit card; we do not accept online-access orders at the office. Our Forum is up and running, so online subscribers can post their comments relating to what they've read in the magazine and at our website.

Why is the website so important? Because young people spend enormous amounts of time on the Internet, and it goes without saying that young people are the future of orthodox Catholicism and the NOR. Do something for our young people! Do something for yourself.

So please do help us achieve our modest fundraising goal by sending your donation to: New Oxford Review, 1069 Kains Ave., Berkeley CA 94706. The New Oxford Review is a nonprofit entity and has 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status with the Internal Revenue Service. Donations are therefore tax deductible to the extent allowed by law. Checks are to be made out to New Oxford Review. Credit card donations can also be made at our website.

DOSSIER: Neocons & Neoconservativism

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Europa & Palestine News « Kawther Salam: Letter From Cell 9 Of The Apartheid State Of Israel

Europa & Palestine News « Kawther Salam:

Letter From Cell 9 Of The Apartheid State Of Israel

Israeli naval forces invaded and hijacked a medical aid ship on its way to Gaza

Dear sisters and brothers, friends and loved ones,

I write to you from cell 9, block 59 Givon Prison near Ramla in Occupied Palestine. Although I was tasered during the assault on the Tahrir, and bruised during forcible removal dockside (I am limping slightly as a result) I am basically ok. We, Ehab, Michael, Karen from Tahrir, as well as Karen, Kit (US) and Jihan who we saw briefly this morning. We are most concerned about our Tahrir shipmate, Palestinian Majd Kayyal from Haifa, last seen by us at Ashdod being photographed and put in a police car.

Although Michael and I (among others) were transported in handcuffs and leg shackles, let me stress that we are neither criminals nor illegal immigrants but rather political prisoners of the apartheid state of Israel. Four from the Tahrir are imprisoned with 12 Irish comrades from the Saoirse, who have more experience with such issues. The four of us, Ehab and I (Cdn), Michael (Aus) and Hassan (UK) have joined with the Irish in their political prisoners’ committee in order to press our collective demands:

Association in the block – i.e. open cells
Adequate writing and reading material
Free communication with outside world – i.e. regular phone calls
Information about shipmate women held at same prison


We add one Tahrir-specific demand: that Israeli state recognize the professional status of Democracy Now journalist Jihan Hafiz in accordance with her credentials from the US government. All political incarceration is unjust but let me stress that in duration and conditions, our situation pales in comparison to the plight of thousands of Palestinian political prisoners and to the open air prison of Gaza.

If you have energy to devote to solidarity actions in the coming days, please concentrate on them. We must get Tahrir back and hope Freedom Waves continue.

Free Majd Kayyal! Free all political prisoners! Free Gaza! Free Palestine!

Anishnabe-debuewin, restons humaine, stay human, in love and struggle,

David Heap of London, Ontario

Majd Kayyal was released, but it appears the other political prisoners weren’t told where he was taken.

Freedom Waves journalists held in Israeli prison

It seems that at least one of Kit and Jihan, and probably both, is still in Israeli detention. This AFP story was filed minutes ago. My understanding is that among the journalists, Jihan and Hassan refused to sign the deportation order.

A group of 21 activists who tried to sail to Gaza in breach of an Israeli blockade of the territory remain in Israeli custody, pending legal proceedings, the interior ministry said on Sunday.

“There are 21 passengers detained who refused to be expelled immediately and are engaged in proceedings against their deportation before an Israeli judge,” interior ministry spokeswoman Sabine Haddad told AFP.

“Only after these proceedings are complete… can they be deported,” she said. The 21 activists were among 27 passengers and crew aboard two ships intercepted by the Israeli navy as they tried to run the blockade of the Gaza Strip.

Israeli commandos boarded the Irish-flagged Saoirse (Freedom) and the Canadian ship Tahrir (Liberation) in international waters off Gaza on Friday before the navy escorted them to the port of Ashdod, the Israeli military said.

On Saturday, Israel freed six of the passengers — an Arab-Israeli, two Greek crewmen, and three journalists from Egypt, Spain and the United States.

She said the remaining 21 people were still being held at a detention facility in Ramla near Tel Aviv, after questioning by immigration authorities.

Those still in Israeli detention are from Australia, Britain, Canada, Ireland and the United States.

The attempt to sail to Gaza was the latest in a string of activist missions aimed at breaching Israel’s blockade of the territory.

In May 2010, six ships led by the Turkish Mavi Marmara tried to reach the coastal strip, but were intercepted by Israeli commandos, who stormed the boats, killing nine Turkish activists and sparking a diplomatic crisis with Ankara.

Earlier this year, a second flotilla tried to reach Gaza, but several ships were sabotaged — which activists blamed on Israel — and the one boat that made the sailing was intercepted before it could reach Gaza.

Israel says its blockade is necessary to prevent weapons from entering the coastal territory, which is run by the Islamist Hamas movement. Two months ago, a UN report on the 2010 flotilla raid accused the Jewish state of acting with “excessive force” but found that its naval blockade of Gaza was legal.

Robert Naiman
Policy Director
Just Foreign Policy
www.justforeignpolicy.org
naiman [at] justforeignpolicy [dot] org

Israeli naval forces invaded and hijacked medical aid ships to Gaza

Date: 2007-06-08, Place: Heiligendamm, Title: offset this, Group/Artist: unknown



Date: 2007-06-08, Place: Heiligendamm, Title: offset this, Group/Artist: unknown


Pambazuka